Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Minnesota State University, Mankato, USA

ABSTRACT

Research has shown that American students often need to improve in solving word problems than their international peers. Several factors contribute to this trend, including differences in curriculum, teaching methods, and cultural attitudes toward mathematics education (Mullis, Martin, Foy, & Hooper, 2016; OECD, 2019). “Traditional mathematics instruction has always focused on skills and shot-cut problem-solving,” often assessing students’ ability to solve word problems solely based on the correctness of their final answers. This results-oriented evaluation fails to effectively diagnose the root causes of students’ difficulties in solving word problems. If students can be guided through problem-solving processes and strategies, it would be beneficial in enhancing their problem-solving abilities.

KEYWORDS

mathematical word problems, problem-solving, teaching problem-solving

Cite this paper

Yea-Ling Tsao. (2024). Enhancing Student’s Ability to Solve Mathematical Word Problems. US-China Education Review A, August 2024, Vol. 14, No. 8, 497-504.

References

Ashlock, R. B. (2006). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to improve instruction. Boston: Pearson Education.

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Booth, J. L., & Koedinger, K. R. (2012). Key misconceptions in Algebraic problem solving. In R. S. Sieger & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (Vol. 2, pp. 1-48). Hoboken: Wiley.

Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. New York: Harper Collins.

Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. London: Freeman.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics and science. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do (Vol. I). OECD Publishing.

Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Russell, W. S. J. (2000). Developing computational fluency with whole numbers in the elementary grades. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(3), 154-158.

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.

Siegler, R. S. (2003). Implications of cognitive science research for mathematics education. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 219-233). Reston, VA: NCTM.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]