Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
A Few Notes on Auctions: The Boom in the Asymmetric Art Auction Market
Author(s)
Ewa Drabik
Full-Text PDF
XML 435 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2185/2022.06.002
Affiliation(s)
Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
ABSTRACT
The
art market, following the example of financial markets, is divided into a
primary market, where works are traded directly from artists, and a secondary
market that is mainly the auction market. COVID-19 and galloping inflation have
influenced the creation of a bull market in artwork. The high incomes of some
buyers and inflation have influenced the emergence of the so-called “glittery”
art market. Works by neglected artists have “very much taken on a life of their
own”: fantasy art, works by young poster artists, casting “nightmares”—have
been selling well for more than a year. People terrified of inflation are
putting their money “in works of art”. The auction market dominates the primary
market because anonymity makes it easier to enter the art market. The gallery
market does not guarantee this anonymity. Very often, the auction market for
works of art is used for money laundering. The purpose of this paper is to show
that auction mechanisms are a good tool for the efficient allocation of goods
and money in an era of galloping inflation, including non-standard objects such
as works of art. These mechanisms, due to the information asymmetry, often lead
to the generation of all kinds of pathologies and the increasing incidence of
the phenomenon known as the winner’s curse.
KEYWORDS
bidding, auction mechanism, art auction market, asymmetric auction
Cite this paper
References