 |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Philosophical Matrix and Dialectics: A Path to a Transdisciplinary Language
Yuriy Rotenfeld
Full-Text PDF
XML 77 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5313/2026.04.003
ANO “Infilinn”, Lugansk, Lugansk People’s Republic
The article “The Philosophical Matrix and Dialectics: A Path to a Transdisciplinary Language” proposes a new paradigm of dialectics embodied in the concept of the Philosophical Matrix as a foundation for creating a universal language capable of overcoming the fragmentation of knowledge between the humanities and natural sciences. The development is based on the concept of the Philosophical Matrix, which integrates key categories such as “identity”, “difference”, “opposition”, “orthogonality”, and others. The author builds upon Hegelian dialectics, expanding it through empirically grounded concepts, and demonstrates how the interaction between the particular and the universal, as well as between the metaphysical and dialectical levels, enables the description of both static and dynamic aspects of reality. Special attention is given to the distinction between natural and social systems, emphasizing that past errors—stemming from the mechanical application of natural laws to society—can be addressed through conscious regulation of contradictions. The article is aimed at philosophers, researchers of transdisciplinarity and complexity theory, as well as those engaged in the development of universal categories of thought. It highlights the importance of dialectics as a tool for knowledge integration and offers practical approaches to addressing contemporary social and environmental challenges.
dialectics, transdisciplinarity, universal language, philosophical matrix, oppositions, knowledge integration
Yuriy Rotenfeld. (2026). The Philosophical Matrix and Dialectics: A Path to a Transdisciplinary Language. Philosophy Study, July-Aug. 2026, Vol. 16, No. 4, 389-397.
Alekseeva, I. Yu., & Arshinov, V. I. (2016). Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i NBIKS revolyutsiya. Moscow: IF RAN. (in Russian)
Ancient Chinese Philosophy. (1972). Collected texts in two volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)
Aristotle. (1975). Works in four volumes. Vol. 1. V. F. Asmus, (Ed.). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)
Carnap, R. (1971). Philosophical foundations of physics: Introduction to the philosophy of science. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)
Gott, V. S., Semenyuk, E. P., & Ursul, A. D. (1984). Categories of modern science (formation and development). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970-1972). Science of logic. In 3 Volumes. Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)
Husserl, E. (2011). Philosophy as a rigorous science. Moscow: Logos. (in Russian)
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason. Moscow: Literatura. (in Russian)
Knyazeva, E. N. (2005). Edgar Morin in search of a method for understanding complexity. In E. Morin, Method. The nature of nature (pp. 5-26). Moscow: Progress-Tradition. (in Russian)
Knyazeva, E. N. (2011). Transdisciplinary research strategies. TSPU Bulletin, 10(112), 193-201. (in Russian)
Makovelsky, A. O. (1914). Presocratics. Kazan. (in Russian)
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1955-1981). Collected works (2nd ed.). Moscow: Politizdat. (in Russian)
Morin, E. (2005). Method. The nature of nature. (E. N. Knyazeva, Trans.). Moscow: Progress-Tradition. (in Russian)
Morin, E. (2021). On complexity. (Y. I. Svirsky, Trans.). Moscow: Institute of Humanitarian Studies. (in Russian)
Nicolescu, B. (1994). The charter of transdisciplinarity. Retrieved from https://inters.org/Freitas-Morin-Nicolescu-Transdisciplinarity
Rotenfeld, Yu. A. (1991). Non-classical dialectics. Moscow: Luch. (in Russian)
Rotenfeld, Yu. A. (2024). Cumulative philosophy as a verifiable rigorous science: Apology of pure mind. Moscow: Znanie-M. (in Russian)
Rotenfeld, Y. (2023). Philosophical matrix as a system of categories of pure mind. Philosophy Study, 13(6), 269-274.
Rotenfeld, Y. (2025). Categories of pure mind as the foundation of transdisciplinary thinking. Philosophy Study, 15(3), 125-130.
Stepin, V. S. (2011). Historical types of scientific rationality in their relation to the problem of complexity. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. (in Russian)
The Fragments of Early Greek Philosophers. (1989). Part I. Prepared by A. V. Lebedev. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)