Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
customer@davidpublishing.com
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey

ABSTRACT

The given research was implemented in order to investigate the correlation between reading comprehension awareness and scientific literacy of end-of-year students pursuing final-year programmes in social sciences (Information and Document Management, Geography, Philosophy, Turkish Language and Literature, and Islamic Studies) in a developing university. In this regard, the research was to find out whether there was a departmental disparity in achievements of social sciences students in reading comprehension and scientific literacy, and whether there was a correlation between the two skills. The methodology of the study was developed in 2 stages. The first stage involved a scale that was used to establish the level of the self-efficacy of the participants in their reading comprehension. The second stage of the research involved information literacy/critical thinking questions on a text that had the topics of health, nutrition, and food in relation to day-to-day life. The overall results acquired during the study show that even though the students were scoring high in the reading comprehension self-efficacy scale, their level of scientific literacy was lower than expected. The results illustrate that there are challenges in scientific process abilities including reading comprehension and interpretation, presenting scientific evidence, and scientific reasoning. The correlation studies validate the fact that the presence of reading comprehension skills is not enough to be scientifically literate and that such skills must be nurtured. The findings of the research indicate that the objective of the education system which implies that every citizen should be scientifically literate has some weaknesses. Considering these outcomes, it is implied that the curricula of social sciences need to be enhanced to train the abilities of scientific reasoning, and the additional programmes are to be proposed to enhance the levels of student competencies on this matter.

KEYWORDS

scientific literacy, critical thinking, social science students, academic achievement, reading comprehension, critical inquiry

Cite this paper

Burcu Umut ZAN, Nuray ZAN. (2026). Impact of Reading Competencies on Scientific Literacy for Social Science Students. US-China Education Review A, June 2026, Vol. 16, No. 6, 375-392. 

References

Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). STEM education: A metaphor for learning to cross cultural borders. Science Education, 87(5), 613-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10074

American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.

Aşıcı, M . (2009). Literacy as a Personal and Social Value. Journal of Values Education, 7(17), 9-26. Retrieved July 1, 2019 from http://dergipark.org.tr/ded/issue/29183/312492

Aydın, A., & Tarakçı, F. (2018). Analysis of reading, interpreting and drawing graphs by teacher candidates of sciences. Primary Education Online, 17(1).

Aydoğdu, B. (2006). Identification of variables affecting scientific process skills in primary education science and technology course. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Educational Sciences.

Bayazıt, İ. (2011). Teacher candidates’ knowledge level of graphs. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(4), 1325-1346.

Bircan, İ., & Tekin, M. (1989). The problem of reading habit on decline in Turkey and its solutions. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal, 22(1), 393-410.

Bloom, B. S.(1995). Human characteristics and school learning. (Tra. D. Ali Özçelik), Istanbul: National Education Publishing.

Bossér, U. (2024). Transformation of school science practices to promote functional scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 265-281.

Curdy, R. W. (1958). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. The Science Teacher, 25(3), 161-164.

Epçaçan, C. (2009). An overview of reading comprehension strategies. Journal of International Social Research, 1(6).

Epçaçan, C., & Demirel, Ö. (2011). The validity and reliability study of reading comprehension self-efficacy scale. Journal of International Social Research, 4(16).

Fujinami, K., Shimomae, K., Shimada, K., & Isozaki, T. (2025). Incorporating socio-scientific issues in science classes: Co-teaching with a social studies teacher. Research in Science Education, 55(4), 1005-1028.

Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education, 6(1).

Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13-16.

Kumar, V., & Choudhary, S. K. (2025). Reimagining scientific literacy: A textbook framework for future-focused science education. Research in Science Education, 55(4), 1109-1127.

Lonsbury, J. G., & Ellis, J. D. (2002). Science history as a means to teach nature of science concepts: Using the development of understanding related to mechanisms of inheritance. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(2).

MEB (2018). Science and technology curriculum for primary education. TTKB, Ankara.

PISA. (2019), PISA Turkey. PISA Official Website. Retrieved January 5, 2019 from http://pisa.meb.gov.tr/

Pun, J., Cheung, K. K. C., & Kenneth-Li, W. (2025). Secondary students’ reading of socio-scientific image-texts on climate change in a GPT-4 scenario. Research in Science Education, 1-20.

Roy, G., Sikder, S., & Letts, W. (2025). Understanding the process of scientific literacy development among children in the early years through play and intentionality. Research in Science Education, 1-24.

Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. Teachers College Press.

Sun, S. Y. K., Chan, M. H., Wang, D., & Wang, L. L. (2025). Gender-specific cognitive skills and moderating role of reading comprehension in shaping science literacy. Research in Science Education, 1-22.

Yıldız, M., & Akyol, H. (2011). The relationship between reading comprehension, motivation and habit of 5th grade students. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 31(3), 793-815.

Yılmaz, M. (2008). Developing methods of reading comprehension skills in Turkish. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 5(9).

Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018

Yörük, Zan, N. (2008). Effects of science, technology, society and environment (STSE) approach based on 5E model on teaching chemistry. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Hacettepe University Institute of Science.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: order@davidpublishing.com