 |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Cruz García Lirios, Juan Guillermo Mansilla Sepúlveda, Wilfrido Isidro Aldana Balderas
Full-Text PDF
XML 66 Views
DOI:10.17265/2160-6579/2026.02.003
Universidad de la Salud, Mexico City, México Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco, Chile Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Huehuetoca City, Mexico
This study develops and empirically tests a structural equation model integrating phenomenological theory and linguistic pragmatics. The proposed framework conceptualizes transcendental intentionality as the foundational dimension from which aesthetic descriptive experience, sign-meaning structuration, pragmatic sense directionality, and communicative teleology emerge. A cross-sectional, non-experimental design was implemented with a sample exceeding the minimum statistical requirement for covariance-based structural equation modeling. Latent variables were operationalized through validated Likert-type scales, and content validity was established via expert judgment. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity. Structural path analysis revealed that transcendental intentionality significantly predicts aesthetic descriptive experience and sign-meaning structuration, while pragmatic sense directionality mediates the relationship between meaning formation and communicative teleology. Global fit indices indicated adequate model fit. The findings support the empirical coherence of translating phenomenological and pragmatic constructs into measurable latent variables, contributing to interdisciplinary dialogue between transcendental philosophy and quantitative modeling.
transcendental intentionality, aesthetic experience, meaning constitution, pragmatic sense, communicative teleology, structural equation modeling
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/97801982455
37.001.0001
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bollen, P. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY, USA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118619174
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press. doi:10.4324/9781315717296
Bühler, K. (1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/z.47
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (3rd
ed.). New York, NY, USA: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315
757421
Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17(3), 304-323. doi:10.1007/BF00485035
De Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill. doi:10.1515/9783110806750
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN, USA: Indiana University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt16xw9gf
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1. Boston, MA, USA: Beacon Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1wxv67
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson. doi:10.4324/9780429442983
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row. doi:10.1002/9781405165513
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-4952-7
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, first book. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6
Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations, Vols. 1-2. London, U.K.: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203991805
Ingarden, R. (1973). The Literary work of art. Evanston, IL, USA: Northwestern University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv47w3w5
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262694032.003.0002
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL, USA: Scientific Software International. doi:10.2307/2232673
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press. doi:10.4324/9781315757421
Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674496113
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX, USA: Texas Christian University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt13x0v2k
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173452
Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL, USA: Northwestern University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv47w3xk
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470995292