![]() |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
WANG Jiahao, LIU Hongli
Full-Text PDF
XML 18 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-623X/2026.04.009
Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China; Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
The effectiveness of multimodal resources in second-language vocabulary teaching remains a key issue, particularly regarding how different presentation modes influence learning outcomes. However, existing studies largely focus on short-term learning outcomes and assess vocabulary along a single dimension, obscuring how multimodal presentation affects vocabulary acquisition and retention. In this study, we examine the effects of three-modal combinations empirically—text, image, and audio—on Chinese vocabulary learning by Korean children. Immediate and delayed tests assessed three dimensions: meaning, word form, and grammatical collocations. Results showed that in the immediate test, the text-image group led in form/meaning, while text-image-audio excelled short-term in collocations. In the delayed test, the text-image group maintained stable performance and significantly outperformed the other two groups, whereas the text-image-audio group showed a marked decline. The findings indicate that the text-image integration more effectively supports long-term memory of Chinese vocabulary in children, whereas multimodal stacking may increase cognitive load and impair retention. This study provides pedagogical guidance for applying multimodal resources in children’s L2 Chinese vocabulary instruction.
multimodal presentation, Chinese vocabulary learning, Korean children, teaching Chinese as a second language
WANG Jiahao, LIU Hongli. (2026). An Empirical Study of the Effects of Multimodal Presentation on Korean-Speaking Children’s Acquisition of Chinese Vocabulary—Evidence From Immediate and Delayed Testing. US-China Education Review A, April 2026, Vol. 16, No. 4, 242-249.
Cai, S., Jiao, X. Y., Yang, Y., Jiang, L. F., & Yu, S. Q. (2021). Practice of multimodal smart classroom in 5G environment. Modern Distance Education Research, 33(5), 103-112.
Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feng, Y., & Zhou, R. (2019). The embodied cognition effect in second language verb processing under the spatial cueing paradigm. Foreign Language Research, 206(1), 71-78.
Fu, X., & Li, A. (2020). A review of research on audiovisual multimodal input in second language. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition), 18(1), 7-16.
Li, W. (2022). An empirical study on the effects of multimodal vocabulary presentation on high school students’ vocabulary memory. Master’s thesis, Northwest Normal University.
Lin, C. C., & Yu, Y. C. (2017). Effects of presentation modes on mobile-assisted vocabulary learning and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 528-542.
Liu, J., & Ouyang, J. (2019). Effects of vocabulary presentation modes and cognitive styles on second language vocabulary learning efficacy. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Basic English Education), 21(3), 19-27.
Liu, Z., Lin, G. Y., Tan, H. L., Zhang, H. Y., Lu, Y. F., Gao, X. X., … Chen, N. F. (2025). SingaKids: A multilingual multimodal dialogic tutor for language learning. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 6: Industry Track, pp. 1244-1253). Vienna, Austria.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, 13(4), 221-246.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2015). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Wang, K. (2011). An electrophysiological investigation of the role of orthography in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words. Neuroscience Letters, 487(3), 297-301.
Wilson, L. B., Tregellas, J. R., Slason, E., Pasko, B. E., & Rojas, D. C. (2011). Implicit phonological priming during visual word recognition. NeuroImage, 55(2), 724-731.
Xu, Z. Y. (1994). The relationship between children’s language and cognitive (thinking) development. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 26(4), 347-353.
Zhang, J., & Xu, H. (2022). Multimodal strategies for Chinese language teaching in Korean ethnic primary schools. Sinogram Culture, 34(10), 107-108 + 114.
Zhang, P. (2000). The effects of animation on information seeking performance on the World Wide Web: Securing attention or interfering with primary tasks? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1-28.
Zhou, Z. (2020). Effects of input modality and practice frequency on interpreting quality: A study based on cognitive load theory. Language Education, 8(1), 8-14.




