 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
M. K. Leung1, Dicken Poon1, Yuxiu Zu1, Yueyang He2, Tim Huang3, Kenneth Leung4, Jenny Zhao4, K. S. Wong, Edward Ng2, Chak Sang Yue5 and Yuk-ching Cheung5
Full-Text PDF
XML 14 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2025.12.001
1. Ronald Lu & Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd., Hong Kong, China 2. School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China 3. VIRCON (Hong Kong) Ltd., Hong Kong, China 4. Ove Arup & Partners (Hong Kong) Ltd., Hong Kong, China 5. Buildings Department, The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, Hong Kong, China
A set of guidelines comprising 2-dimensional prescriptive building separation requirements was promulgated by HKSAR (Hong Kong Special Administrative Region)’s BD (Buildings Department) in 2011 to promote better urban ventilation. However, some practitioners have concerns about applying the guidelines for projects with complex geometries. Projects may adopt alternative assessment methods using wind tunnel or CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations to demonstrate compliance, but the required time and cost are also a concern. Given the concerns and stakeholders’ collective experience using the guidelines, BD commissioned a study in January 2024 to establish an alternative automated assessment tool for cost-effective evaluation of building permeability design using BIM (building information modelling) technologies. A new geometric parametrisation method—LCP (Least Cost Path) was proposed. The method evaluates FC (Friction Cost) and TC (Turning Cost), measuring building design’s airflow resistance and path complexity. These metrics are applied within a 3D (3-dimensional) assessment grid system for a building project’s low, middle and high zones. Normalised CFD and LCP performances were reviewed, showing a strong correlation (R² ~ 0.8). The study also identified a cost threshold under the LCP method that differentiates “good” from “poor” ventilation designs. An automated BIM-integrated assessment tool using the LCP method will be further developed in Phase B of the Study.
Building permeability, sustainable architecture, volumetric design criteria
M. K. Leung, Dicken Poon, Yuxiu Zu, Yueyang He, Tim Huang, Kenneth Leung, Jenny Zhao, K. S. Wong, Edward Ng, Chak Sang Yue and Yuk-ching Cheung. (2025). Volumetric Criteria and an Automated Assessment Tool Development for Optimising Building Permeability Design in High-Density Urban Environments. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, December 2025, Vol. 19, No. 12, 561-571.
[2] Ng, E., Yuan, C., Chen, L., Ren, C., and Fung, J. C. 2011. “Improving the Wind Environment in High-Density Cities by Understanding Urban Morphology and Surface Roughness: A Study in Hong Kong.” Landscape and Urban Planning 101 (1): 59-74.
[3] Bedra, K. B., Zheng, B., Li, J., and Luo, X. 2023. “A Parametric-Simulation Method to Study the Interconnections between Urban-Street-Morphology Indicators and Their Effects on Pedestrian Thermal Comfort in Tropical Summer.” Sustainability 15 (11): 8902.
[4] Feng, W., Ding, W., Fei, M., Yang, Y., Zou, W., Wang, L., and Zhen, M. 2021. “Effects of Traditional Block Morphology on Wind Environment at the Pedestrian Level in Cold Regions of Xi’an, China.” Environment, Development and Sustainability 23: 3218-35.
[5] Feng, W., Zhen, M., Ding, W., and Zou, Q. 2022. “Field Measurement and Numerical Simulation of the Relationship between the Vertical Wind Environment and Building Morphology in Residential Areas in Xi’an, China.” Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29 (8): 11663-74.
[6] Gronemeier, T., Raasch, S., and Ng, E. 2017. “Effects of Unstable Stratification on Ventilation in Hong Kong.” Atmosphere 8 (9): 168.
[7] Juan, Y. H., Li, Z., Lee, Y. T., Wen, C. Y., and Yang, A. S. 2023. “Effect of Wind-Based Climate-Responsive Design on City Breathability of a Compact High-Rise City.” Journal of Building Engineering 78: 107773.
[8] Kubota, T., Miura, M., Tominaga, Y., and Mochida, A. 2008. “Wind Tunnel Tests on the Relationship between Building Density and Pedestrian-Level Wind Velocity: Development of Guidelines for Realising Acceptable Wind Environment in Residential Neighbourhoods.” Building and Environment 43 (10): 1699-708.
[9] Li, Z., Zhang, H., Wen, C. Y., Yang, A. S., and Juan, Y. H. 2020. “Effects of Frontal Area Density on Outdoor Thermal Comfort and Air Quality.” Building and Environment 180: 107028.
[10] Ma, T., and Chen, T. 2022. “Outdoor Ventilation Evaluation and Optimisation Based on Spatial Morphology Analysis in Macau.” Urban Climate 46: 101335.
[11] Palusci, O., Monti, P., Cecere, C., Montazeri, H., and Blocken, B. 2022. “Impact of Morphological Parameters on Urban Ventilation in Compact Cities: The Case of the Tuscolano-Don Bosco District in Rome.” Science of the Total Environment 807: 150490.
[12] Wang, W., and Ng, E. 2018. “Air Ventilation Assessment under Unstable Atmospheric Stratification—A Comparative Study for Hong Kong.” Building and Environment 130: 1-13.
[13] Wang, W., and Ng, E. 2018. “Large-Eddy Simulations of Air Ventilation in Parametric Scenarios: Comparative Studies of Urban Form and Wind Direction.” Architectural Science Review 61 (4): 215-25.
[14] Yoshie, R., Tanaka, H., Shirasawa, T., and Kobayashi, T. 2008. “Experimental Study on Air Ventilation in a Built-Up Area with Closely-Packed High-Rise Buildings.” Journal of Environmental Engineering (Transaction of AIJ) 73 (627): 661-7.
[15] Yin, J., Zhan, Q., Xiao, Y., Wang, T., Che, E., Meng, F., and Qian, Y. 2014. “Correlation between Urban Morphology and Wind Environment in Digital City Using GIS and CFD Simulations.” International Journal of Online Engineering 10 (3): 42-48.
[16] Antoniou, N., Montazeri, H., Wigo, H., Neophytou, M. K. A., Blocken, B., and Sandberg, M. 2017. “CFD and Wind-Tunnel Analysis of Outdoor Ventilation in a Real Compact Heterogeneous Urban Area: Evaluation Using ‘Air Delay.’” Building and Environment 126: 355-72.
[17] Hang, J., Sandberg, M., and Li, Y. 2009. “Age of Air and Air Exchange Efficiency in Idealised City Models.” Building and Environment 44 (8): 1714-23.
[18] Peng, Y., Gao, Z., Buccolieri, R., and Ding, W. 2019. “An Investigation of the Quantitative Correlation between Urban Morphology Parameters and Outdoor Ventilation Efficiency Indices.” Atmosphere 10 (1): 33.
[19] Seegmiller, L., Shirabe, T., and Tomlin, C. D. 2021. “A Method for Finding Least-Cost Corridors with Reduced Distortion in Raster Space.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 35 (8): 1570-91.
[20] Bitog, J. P., Lee, I. B., Hwang, H. S., Shin, M. H., Hong, S. W., Seo, I. H., Mostafa, E., and Pang, Z. 2011. “A Wind Tunnel Study on Aerodynamic Porosity and Windbreak Drag.” Forest Science and Technology 7 (1): 8-16.
[21] Raine, J. K., and Stevenson, D. C. 1977. “Wind Protection by Model Fences in a Simulated Atmospheric Boundary Layer.” Journal of Industrial Aerodynamics 2: 159-80.
[22] He, Y., Tablada, A., Deng, J. Y., Shi, Y., Wong, N. H., and Ng, E. 2022. “Linking of Pedestrian Spaces to Optimise Outdoor Air Ventilation and Quality in Tropical High-Density Urban Areas.” Urban Climate 45: 101249.