 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Public Space and Perception of Terror
Muhammed Fatih Çetintaş
Full-Text PDF
XML 37 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2025.08.004
Department of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34437, Turkey
While people met in order to socialize on public spaces in the past, these areas are perceived as a ‘alone in the crowds’ by people who are in the loneliness of modern era, as well as these areas still serve as a social area. Individuals from all of society, especially minority groups, feel that they are accepted and they show themselves in a way in the public space. Even though the perception and usage of public space have changed in time, people still feel free themselves in these areas. However, ‘terrorism’, which is a reality in today's world, is one of the cases which pose danger to the public spaces. Thus, the image of these areas has changed from “the areas where individuals they feel freer” to “the areas where people are vulnerable to many potential attacks”. This study tells you how the public perception has changed over time and examine the intended use of the public due to these changes. Terrorist activities increased all of the World and public spaces of the individual in the face of this reality, perception and Jane Jacobs, urban life and public relations with the charm of the terrorist phenomenon is one of the main problems the 21st century in the context of views on security are discussed. Also in this report, in order to provide a team recommendation for safe public space taking into account the author's views on security was available. For this purpose, the metropolis of Istanbul is selected as the study area were interviewed and the people living in Istanbul with internet environment. At the end of the 90s until today has changed the perception of how the public and in the public domain when individuals are discussed how they use.
Public, public space, security, perception, terror, Jane Jacobs.
Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 19 (2025) 396-402
doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2025.08.004
[1] Jane, J. ç. D., 2005. Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı. İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık.
[2] Onat, N., 2013. Kamusal Alan Ve Sınırlaı. 1. Baskı dü. İstanbul: Durak İstanbul Kültür&Sanat&Galeri.
[3] Tekeli, İ., 1993. “İcabında Plan” volume 4, p:26-37.. s.l.:s.n.
[4] Çin, T., 2006. Transformation Of A Public Space In Istanbul: The Eminönü Square. Ankara: METU.
[5] Taşçı, H., 2014. Bir Hayat Tarzı Olarak Şehir, Mekan, Meydan. 1.Basım dü. İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.
[6] Habermas, J., 2007. Kamusallığın Yapısal Dönüşümü. 7. Baskı dü. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
[7] Gökgür, P., 2008. Kentsel Mekanda Kamusal Alanın Yeri. İstanbul: s.n.
[8] M. Ebru Erdönmez, A. A., 2005. AÇIK KAMUSAL KENT MEKANLARININ TOPLUM İLİŞKİLERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ. Megaron YTÜ Mim. Fak. e-Dergisi YTU Arch. Fac. e-Journal, 1(1).
[9] Mehmet Nazım, Ö. M. A. A., 2005. Kamusal Odak Olarak Kent. Planlama-Şehir Plancıları Odası, Issue 3.
[10] Zucker, P., 1959. Town and square: From the agora to the village green. New York: Columbia University Press.
[11] Carmona, M. H. T. O. T. T. S., 2006. Public Places, Urban Spaces. s.l.:Oxford, Architectural Press.
[12] Özdemir, A., 2009. KATILIMCI KENTLİ KİMLİĞİNİN OLUŞUMUNDA KAMUSAL YEŞİL ALANLARIN ROLÜ: ANKARA KENT PARKLARI ÖRNEĞİ. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Issue 1, pp. 144-153.
[13] FERUDUN, D. Y. A., 2009. KIYI ALANLARININ HUKUKİ STATÜSÜ. Journal of Naval Science and Engineering , 5(1), pp. 76-93.