Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Larysa Zhdankina
Full-Text PDF
XML 242 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2025.05.001
Affiliation(s)
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Ukraine
ABSTRACT
During a full-scale
destructive war in Ukraine, constitutional control, as an element of the state
system of legal protection of fundamental values and guarantees of human
rights, has embodied the people’s will to establish peace, freedom, democracy,
respect for human dignity, and protection of human rights. The Constitutional
Court of Ukraine, as a state body with unique powers to maintain the balance of
power, plays a fundamental role in ensuring that legislation aligns with
constitutional principles and human rights standards during this difficult period.
Since gaining independence in 1991, Ukraine has faced two simultaneous
transitions: overcoming its post-Soviet legacy that has flooded all spheres of
public and state life and defending against Russian military aggression for
over 11 years. This paper explores the role of constitutional review in Ukraine
during its full-scale war, highlighting its significance as part of the state’s
legal framework for protecting human rights and core values. It examines the
contribution of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to restoring human rights
and improving constitutional oversight, especially during the adoption and
amendment of laws. Specific decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine
showcase its ability to address remnants of Ukraine’s colonial Soviet past and
its potential to shape institutional reforms that may become integral to
Ukraine’s transitional justice system in the post-war era. While the
Constitutional Court is not a legislator, its decisions provide a crucial
finality to the law-making process, positioning it as a key actor in Ukraine’s
transitional justice efforts.
KEYWORDS
constitutional control, transitional justice, post-Soviet legacy, human rights protection, post-war reconstruction
Cite this paper
References