![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Research on the Impact of Blended Learning Models on Developing Students’ Deep Learning Capabilities
Miling Chen
Full-Text PDF
XML 17 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-623X/2025.06.009
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
The demand for diversified instructional strategies remains a fundamental rationale towards the use of blended learning models. This is a growing area within the education sector that has integrated face to face interventions with the online strategies. The goal is to create a transformative educational approach that utilizes modern day technologies to meet desired learning outcomes. The scope of this research is to evaluate the impact of blended learning models as a route towards enhanced critical thinking and problem-solving abilities among the students. The evaluation will entail the use of contemporary educational frameworks as well as pedagogical theories. The key areas of interest include the use personalized instructions, and increased student engagement. The notable findings from this research include increased student autonomy, continuous feedback mechanisms, and the use of multimodal content delivery techniques. Also, an important insight learnt from the findings pertains to the need for thorough examination of the opportunities such as enhanced technological infrastructure as well as proper alignment between the process and the outcomes. Thus, this research will have significant input towards the implementation of blended learning models as an alternative to leverage optimal educational goals. This includes the awareness of the importance of this approach towards enriched student experience and engagement at the classroom level.
pedagogical models, blended learning, educational technology, deep learning capabilities and metacognition
Miling Chen. (2025). Research on the Impact of Blended Learning Models on Developing Students’ Deep Learning Capabilities. US-China Education Review A, June 2025, Vol. 15, No. 6, 451-461.
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). London: Open University Press.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (2021). Active learning in blended environments: Strategies for promoting deep learning. Journal of Educational Innovation, 15(2), 45-62.
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K-12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction to the theory of hybrids. San Mateo: Clayton Christensen Institute.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 3.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569.
Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational technology: A primer for the 21st century. London: Springer.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. London: Routledge.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. London: Routledge.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11.
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “blended learning” be redeemed? E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17-26.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.