Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Minzu University of China, Beijing, China

ABSTRACT

 This article examines the implementation of Russia’s national project for a unified educational space, focusing on the pivotal roles of Federal Basic General Education Programs (FOPs) and Federal State Educational Standards (FGOS). Through a detailed analysis of recent revisions to the literature curriculum standards (FGOS), the study identifies two core policy objectives driving standardization: reinforcing state-aligned traditional values (patriotism, national identity, historical memory) and enhancing educational efficiency and equity (reducing teacher/student workload, bridging regional disparities). However, the analysis reveals significant tensions in practice. Curriculum restructuring—prioritizing Russian classics, multi-ethnic literature, and war narratives while reducing foreign (especially Western) contemporary works—faces challenges including misalignment with the national university entrance exam (EGE) requirements, pedagogical difficulties in teaching lengthy canonical texts (e.g., War and Peace), and ideological debates surrounding specific mandated authors (e.g., Fadeev). Furthermore, the conspicuous absence of non-Western literature, despite the official “Pivot to the East” strategy, highlights a gap between geopolitical rhetoric and curricular content. The Russian case demonstrates the complex interplay between centralized educational standardization, cultural-political objectives, and the practical realities of classroom implementation in a globalized context.

KEYWORDS

educational standardization, national curriculum policy, literature education, traditional values, Russia

Cite this paper

YA Ru. (2025). Tensions in Russia’s Educational Standardization Project (Literature Curriculum Focus). US-China Education Review A, June 2025, Vol. 15, No. 6, 435-440.

References

Иванова, С. В., & Иванов, О. Б. (2020). Образовательное пространство как модус образовательной политики. Русское слово.

Кашаев, А. А., & Гукаленко, О. В. (2024). Единое образовательное пространство регионального формата как механизм повышения качества общего образования: вопросы управления. Ценности и смыслы, 4, 68-86.

Княгинина, Н. (2020). Что мы знаем о фгос? зачем нужны образовательные стандарты, как они менялись и исследовались (Ч. 1). Образовательная политика, 4, 48-56.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]