Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the divergent receptions of Lu Xun in China and the Anglophone world, examining how his image has been constructed, exalted, and contested across ideological and cultural boundaries. In China, Lu Xun is revered as a literary saint and revolutionary prophet, with his contributions to the New Culture Movement and critiques of feudalism canonized in public memory. In contrast, Anglophone scholarship has deconstructed his figure, focusing on translation politics, Cold War anxieties, postcolonial theory, and aesthetic modernism. Western critics have examined his ethical ambiguities, ideological complexities, and the aesthetic tensions in his work. This comparative analysis highlights how Lu Xun’s legacy reflects both the complexity of his work and the cultural, theoretical, and political contexts of his interpreters.

KEYWORDS

Lu Xun, literary reception, cultural criticism, aesthetic modernism, Chinese enlightenment

Cite this paper

Journal of Literature and Art Studies, April 2025, Vol. 15, No. 4, 263-273

References

Anderson, M. (1990). The limits of realism: Chinese fiction in the revolutionary period. California: University of California Press.

Cheng, E. J. (2013). Literary remains: Death, trauma and Lu Xuns refusal to mourn. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.

Chou, E. S. (2012). Memory, Violence, Queues: Lu Xun Interprets China. Ann Arbor: Association for Asian Studies.

Chow, R. (1991). Woman and Chinese modernity: The politics of reading between West and East. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Davies, G. (2013). Lu Xuns revolution: Writing in a time of violence. Harvard: Harvard University Asia Center.

Hsia, C. T. (1971). A history of modern Chinese fiction, 1917-1957 (2nd ed.). Yale: Yale University Press.

Jones, A. F. (2011). Developmental fairy tales: Evolutionary thinking and modern Chinese culture. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Jones, A. F. (2011). Developmental fairy tales: Evolutionary thinking and modern Chinese culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kaldis, N. (2014). The Chinese prose poem: A study of Lu Xuns Wild Grass (Yecao). Cambria: Cambria Press.

Liu, L. H. (1995). Translingual practice: Literature, national culture, and translated modernity—China, 1900-1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Medvedev, O. (1977). Soviet criticism of Lu Hsün (1881-1936). Columbia: Columbia University.

Medvedeva, O. (2010). Lu Xun in the rhetoric of the Sino-Soviet split. Frontiers of Literary Studies in China, 4(3), 483-493.

Mills, H. C. (1963). Lu Hsün and the Communist Party. The China Quarterly, (14), 17-27.

Veg, S. (2014). New readings of Lu Xun: Critic of modernity and re-inventor of heterodoxy. China Perspectives, (03), 49-56.

Von Kowallis, J. E. (2010). The Enigma of Su Xuelin and Lu Xun. Modern Chinese Literature and Culture, 22(2), 493-528.

Wang, D. D.-W. (2004). The monster that is history: History, violence, and fictional writing in Twentieth-Century China. California: University of California Press.

Zhao, W. Y. (2023). The relationship between the mad imagery in Lu Xuns the eternal lamp and Taoist philosophy of life. Dean & Francis Journal, 1-5.

程中原. (1987). 《张闻天与新文学运动》. 江苏文艺出版社, 295页。

胡峰. (2019). 对传统文化深层结构的反思与批判——鲁迅《肥皂》重释. 鲁迅研究月刊, (06), 47-54.

黄乔生. (2019). 黄乔生: 新文化运动代表. 鲁迅实至名归|学术季羊城学堂讲座回顾[EB/OL].

李石. (2020). 解构的行动属性和行动效应——以英语世界鲁迅批评为中心. 中国比较文学, (03), 117-128.

毛泽东. (2022). 《论鲁迅》. 中共中央文献研究室编: 《毛泽东文艺论集》. 中央文献出版社, 9页。

秦林芳. (2023). 解放区前期对鲁迅启蒙主义者形象的建构. 中国现代文学论丛, 18(03), 1-17.

邱焕星. (2022)《一身四面鲁迅革命传统. 社会科学, (06), 63-72.

田刚, 刘茸茸. (2021). 同路人旗手——鲁迅形象塑造及其杂文自觉”. 现代中国文化与文学, (01), 103-117.

夏志清. (2015). 中国现代小说史. 刘绍铭译. 中国香港: 香港中文大学出版社.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]