Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, China

ABSTRACT

Written by Julian Barnes, a well-known contemporary British writer, The Porcupine is a novel with a touch on Bulgaria’s social realities in the early 1990s. However, it is not a realistic novel in a conventional sense. It is composed of forty-three sections, long or short, fragmented in form and laid out by means of montage strategies. In the novel, Barnes used “continuous montage” and “parallel montage” strategies to unveil the plot and tell the story and employed “psychological montage” and “contrast montage” strategies to showcase characters’ consciousness and personalities. The ingenious use of different montage strategies in the novel challenges the linear narrative paradigm in traditionally realistic novels, enriches its narrative structures and textual dimensions, and highlights its dramatic conflict, hence reflecting the narrative innovation in Barnes’s fictional writing and providing new space for the studies of his novels from the viewpoint of narratology and/or postmodernism.

KEYWORDS

Julian Barnes, The Porcupine, montage strategies, narrative innovation

Cite this paper

Journal of Literature and Art Studies, March 2025, Vol. 15, No. 3, 115-125

References

Agudo, J. F. E. (1999). What is right and what is wrong in politics?: Objects of satire in Julian Barnes’ The Porcupine. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, (39), 295-305.

Andreadis, A. (1993). Rev. of The Porcupine by Julian Barnes. Harvard Review, (5), 228-229.

Barnes, J. (1993) The Porcupine. New York: Vintage Books.

Byrne, J. (1993). Rev. of The Porcupine by Julian Barnes. Review of Contemporary Fiction, 13(6), 252-253.

Gosswiller, R. (1993). After the fall. Chicago Tribune, (3 Jan.), 3.

Guignery, V. (2006). The fiction of Julian Barnes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Huapaya, C. (2016). Montage and image as paradigm. Brazilian Journal on Presence Studies, 6(1), 110-123.

Levenson, M. (1991). Flaubert’s parrot. The New Republic, (16 Dec.), 42-45.

Moseley, M. (1997). Understanding Julian Barnes. Columbia, South Carolina: U of South Carolina P.

Peng, S. (2000). The extension of montage theory and practice. Audio-visual Education Studies, 88(8), 13-16.

Repass, W. (2015). Celluloid politics: monolith and montage. Film International, 13(1), 149-155.

Scammell, M. (1993). Trial and error. The New Republic, (4 & 11 Jan.), 35-38.

Taylor, R. (1992). Julian Barnes’s prickly, vivid “Porcupine”. Boston Globe, (25 Nov.), 37.

Waligorska-Olejniczak, B. (2018). Gogol and Magritte: Towards understanding montage strategies. The Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture, 12(1), 81-101.

Xu, N., et al. (Eds). (2005). Dictionary of film art. Revised Ed. Beijing: China’s Film Press.

Yang, R., et al. (2004). On American postmodernist fiction. Qingdao: Qingdao Press.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]