Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Department of Philosophy

ABSTRACT

Since the foundation of the Western modern university in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there has always been debate on the purpose and social or political utility of scientific knowledge. The question remains as to what we consider as ‘useful knowledge’ to be (Flexner, 1939; Gibbons et al., 1994). The purpose of this paper is to explore and propose an alternative conception of scientific knowledge usefulness, advocating for a balanced approach between direct and indirect utility of knowledge in higher education. To this end, the paper revisits Mill’s (1859) conception of epistemic utility as explained in his work On Liberty to present an idea of scientific knowledge usefulness which is utilitarian in a broader sense. Building on this foundation, the paper promotes a pluralistic conception of epistemic utility and suggests a typology by discerning between direct and indirect utility of knowledge. Overall, by revisiting Mill’s (1859) notion of utility, this paper aims to demonstrate that the notion of ‘utility’ is not only a function that serves the Idea of the University, but it is also linked to the notion of ‘self-development’—Bildung. In that sense, one can make the case for a broader and more complex scientific utilitarianism.

KEYWORDS

useful knowledge, epistemic utility, higher education, knowledge economy, idea of the university

Cite this paper

Anna Georgiou. The Idea of the University and the Concept of “Useful” Knowledge. Sociology Study, Jan.-Feb. 2025, Vol. 15, No. 1, 34-42.

References

Barnett, M. (2006). Vocational knowledge and vocational pedagogy. In M. Young and J. Gamble (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and qualifications for South African further education (pp. 143-157). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate (1st ed.). Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation (1st ed., Issues in Higher Education). Oxford; New York: Published for the IAU Press by Pergamon Press.

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.

Fish, S. (2008). Save the world on your own time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Flexner, A. (1939). The usefulness of useless knowledge. Harpers, no. 179.

Flexner, A., & Dijkgraaf, R. (2017). The usefulness of useless knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gibbons, M. (2005). Engagement with the community: The emergence of a new social contract between society and science. Presentation to the Community Engagement Workshop, Griffith University.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE Publications.

Mill, J. S. (2001 [1859]). On liberty. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

Oakeshott, M. J. (2001). The voice of liberal learning. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]