Contact us
 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Alejandra Navarrete Quezada
Cruz García Lirios
Julio E. Crespo
Juan Guillermo MancillaSepúlveda
Wilfrido Isidro Aldana Balderas
Francisco Rubén Sandoval Vázquez
Full-Text PDF
XML 154 Views
DOI:10.17265/2160-6579/2025.01.002
Affiliation(s)
Centro de Estudios Políticos y Sociales, Cuernavaca, México
Universidad de la Salud, CDMX, Mexico
Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile
Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco, Chile
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Edomex, México
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Edomex, México
ABSTRACT
Bioethics is the
argumentative discipline of decisions and actions that reduce conflicts of
interest, dilemmas, or asymmetries between the parties involved in biomedical
research. The objective of this work was to review and compare the dimensions
used by bioethics in the communicative management of the pandemic, namely: risk,
vulnerability, resilience, and stigma. A documentary, exploratory, transversal,
and retrospective work was carried out with a sample of sources indexed in
international repositories, considering the search by keywords and the
publication period from 2020 to 2024. The results demonstrate the prevalence of
supply, contagion, symptoms, and help against COVID-19.
KEYWORDS
COVID-19, bioethics, stigma, resilience, risk, vulnerability
Cite this paper
References