[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Man & Machine: Artificial Intelligence’s Role in Shaping Auditor’s Professional Scepticism
Ilyass Chaker
Full-Text PDF XML 248 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6583/2024.04.002
Department of Accounting – Auditing – Control and Finance, IAE Tours Loire Valley – VALLOREM(VAL de LOire REcherche en Management), University of Tours, Tours, France
This study aims to investigate how auditors’ reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) impacts their professional scepticism in the French auditing profession. While artificial intelligence offers benefits, like improved audit efficiency, concerns arise regarding its potential to reduce scepticism. Using a multiple regression approach with maximum likelihood estimation, we analyzed 107 responses from external auditors. The findings reveal a significant positive association between AI reliance and professional scepticism, moderated by trait scepticism. The study contributes to the existing literature by shedding light on the complex interplay between technological adoption and individual judgment in auditing. It offers insights into the French context and emphasizes the importance of understanding how AI affects professional scepticism among auditors. Additionally, the findings underscore the crucial role of individual auditor traits, such as scepticism levels, in shaping their responses to technological advancements in auditing practices.
artificial intelligence, automated tools, scepticism, due professional care
Abernathy, J. L., Barnes, M., & Stefaniak, C. (2013). A summary of 10 years of PCAOB research: What have we learned? Journal of Accounting Literature, 32(1), 30‑60. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/j.acclit.2013.10.002/full/html
Aksoy, T., & Bicer, A. A. (2021). Common audit deficiencies under the audit quality microscope. In T. Aksoy and U. Hacioglu (Éds.), Auditing ecosystem and strategic accounting in the digital era (pp. 315‑321). New York: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_14
Al-Hiyari, A., Al Said, N., & Hattab, E. (2019). Factors that influence the use of computer assisted audit techniques (CAATs) by internal auditors in Jordan. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(3), 1‑15. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Al-Hiyari/publication/326711731_The_value_relevance_of_purchased_goodwill_in_Malaysian_firms_The_pre-_and_post-IFRS_evidence/links/5cfbbf0c299bf13a38483863/The-value-relevance-of-purchased-goodwill-in-Malaysian-firms-The-pre-and-post-IFRS-evidence.pdf
Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big Data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1‑27. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/ajpt/article-abstract/36/4/1/6016
Austin, A. A., Carpenter, T. D., Christ, M. H., & Nielson, C. S. (2021). The data analytics journey: Interactions among auditors, managers, regulation, and technology. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1888‑1924. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12680
Boillet, J. (2018). How artificial intelligence will transform the audit. Earnest & Young Reporting. Retrieved from https://www.ey.com/en_tr/assurance/how-artificial-intelligence-will-transform-the-audit
Brown-Liburd, H., Issa, H., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Behavioral implications of Big Data’s impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 451‑468. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/accounting-horizons/article-abstract/29/2/451/2190
Cao, T., Duh, R.-R., Tan, H.-T., & Xu, T. (2022). Enhancing auditors’ reliance on data analytics under inspection risk using fixed and growth mindsets. The Accounting Review, 97(3), 131‑153. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/accounting-review/article-abstract/97/3/131/4422
Cho, S., Vasarhelyi, M. A., Sun, T., & Zhang, C. (2020). Learning from machine learning in accounting and assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 17(1), 1‑10. Lakewood Ranch: American Accounting Association. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/jeta/article-abstract/17/1/1/9326
Chowdhury, E. K. (2021). Prospects and challenges of using
artificial intelligence in the audit process. In The essentials of machine
learning in finance and accounting (pp. 139‑156). New
York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/
chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003037903-8/prospects-challenges-using-artificial-intelligence-audit-process-emon-kalyan-chowdhury
Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2021). Prepare for takeoff : Improving asset measurement and audit quality with drone-enabled inventory audit procedures. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(4), 1323‑1343. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09574-5
Cohen, J. R., Dalton, D. W., & Harp, N. L. (2017). Neutral and presumptive doubt perspectives of professional skepticism and auditor job outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62, 1‑20. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368217300636?casa_token=PmZWQ5NCV6oAAAAA:PIOy3aZVawb_AQ5XhllRk_iIleVNbBL2Q0A-STOPbe3Pjg9K-J1qsxL6ZRpbgjwFIgQ3yLEZ-w
Commerford, B. P., Dennis, S. A., Joe, J. R., & Ulla, J. W. (2022). Man versus machine: Complex estimates and auditor reliance on artificial intelligence. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(1), 171‑201. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12407
Cooper, L. A., Holderness Jr, D. K., Sorensen, T. L., & Wood, D. A. (2019). Robotic process automation in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 15‑35. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/accounting-horizons/article-abstract/33/4/15/2405
Dong, X. L., & Rekatsinas, T. (2018). Data integration and machine learning: A natural synergy. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 1645‑1650). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3197387
Fedyk, A., Hodson, J., Khimich, N., & Fedyk, T. (2022). Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 938‑985. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x
Grewal, D. S. (2014). A critical conceptual analysis of definitions of artificial intelligence as applicable to computer engineering. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 16(2), 9‑13. Retrieved from https://professionalismandvalue.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/A_Critical_Conceptual_Analysis_of_Definitions_of_Artificial_Intelligence_as_Applicable_to_Computer_Engineering.pdf
Harris, S. B. (2017). Technology and the audit of today and tomorrow. Speech delivered at PCAOB. AAA Annual Meeting: Washington DC, 20.
Hasan, A. R. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI) in accounting & auditing: A literature review. Open Journal of Business and Management, 10(1), 440‑465. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=115007
Huang, F., No, W. G., Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Yan, Z. (2022). Audit data analytics, machine learning, and full population testing. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 8, 138‑144. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240591882200006X
Huang, F., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2019). Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: A framework. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 35, 100433. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089518301738?casa_token=IJqF2JG7adEAAAAA:1JCfxKcAtmP4x06FPHD1QEUSs8eEYj44SYFmhvXUTPb4onWAlPD4OD8vxwTfpqbX13GBBYPK-w
Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45‑97. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/ajpt/article/32/Supplement%201/45/5876
Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2024). Global internal audit standards.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2021). FAQ: Addressing the risk of overreliance on technology: Use of ATT and use of information produced by entity’s systems.
International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR). (2018). Survey of inspection findings 2017.
Kend, M., & Nguyen, L. A. (2020). Big Data analytics and other emerging technologies: The impact on the australian audit and assurance profession. Australian Accounting Review, 30(4), 269‑282. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12305
Krieger, F., Drews, P., & Velte, P. (2021). Explaining the (non-)adoption of advanced data analytics in auditing: A process theory. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 41, 100511. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089521000130
Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119751. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162518320225?casa_token=pkLLRqxpwJoAAAAA:xde-xFs2hpGP66_F1KGC3iN9DEJ69CG9mKvEObXJ2hY30fhyqp3S9aL2tkTpzC8zxgFs8dIgcQ
Meuldijk, M. (2017). Impact of digitization on the audit profession. KPMG AG Audit Comm. News, 58, 1‑3.
Moffitt, K. C., Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Robotic process automation for auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15(1), 1‑10. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/jeta/article/15/1/1/9252
Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1‑34. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/ajpt/article/28/2/1/5703
Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1‑14. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368218301181?casa_token=8iDh6AKOiygAAAAA:0YcShtDWMxP4-xpZQJvugHWYRWv5xu4q2976drQeCRfOTPnSiIJouJYgOYxb7GETNxINZ0nMrw
Olsen, C., & Gold, A. (2018). Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41(1), 127‑141. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006/full/html
Omoteso, K. (2012). The application of artificial intelligence in auditing: Looking back to the future. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8490‑8495. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095741741200111X
Pedrosa, I., Costa, C. J., & Aparicio, M. (2020). Determinants adoption of computer-assisted auditing tools (CAATs). Cognition, Technology & Work, 22, 565‑583. Retrieved from https://idp.springer.com/authorize/casa?redirect_uri=Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10111-019-00581-4&casa_token=CH71hWfVN_UAAAAA:WMfhYxJVc9lamaAIrATvi0psj-7JUm2b25ibFdum_Zc3BNoSuDkIX1Z2aMuojYnnezSXjc0ncRk1mJS3NA
Peters, C. (2023). Auditor automation usage and professional skepticism. SSRN. Retrieved from https://foundationforauditingresearch.org/files/papers/peters-2022-wp-(002).pdf
Peytcheva, M. (2013). Professional skepticism and auditor cognitive performance in a hypothesis-testing task. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(1), 27‑49. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-04-2013-0852/full/html
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2010). Due professional care in the performance of work. Auditing standard 1015.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2022). Data and technology.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2024). AS 1015: Due professional care in the performance of work.
Rainsbury, E. A. (2019). Audit quality in New Zealand—Early evidence from the regulator. Australian Accounting Review, 29(3), 455‑467. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12276
Raphael, J. (2017). Rethinking the audit. Journal of Accountancy, 223(4), 29‑32.
Robinson, S. N., Curtis, M. B., & Robertson, J. C. (2018). Disentangling the trait and state components of professional skepticism: Specifying a process for state scale development. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(1), 215‑235. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/ajpt/article-abstract/37/1/215/6084
Sun, T. (2019). Applying deep learning to audit procedures: An illustrative framework. Accounting Horizons, 33(3), 89‑109. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/accounting-horizons/article-abstract/33/3/89/2426
Tiberius, V., & Hirth, S. (2019). Impacts of digitization on
auditing: A Delphi study for Germany. Journal of International Accounting,
Auditing and Taxation, 37, 100288. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1061951
819300084?casa_token=nQWTc3wz8z4AAAAA:lmo1qzmk2q4su5zIm0rwEAPDcKgOCypXm1TD4C6P143v_jflOuz3gX-Vee5n6Dtp7mWI3pVrTg
Vitali, S., & Giuliani, M. (2024). Emerging digital technologies and auditing firms: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 53, 100676. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089524000095
Zemánková, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence and blockchain in audit and accounting: Literature review. Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, 16(1), 568‑581. Retrieved from https://wseas.com/journals/bae/2019/b245107-089.pdf
Zhang, C., Thomas, C., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2022). Attended process automation in audit: A framework and a demonstration. Journal of Information Systems, 36(2), 101‑124. Retrieved from https://publications.aaahq.org/jis/article-abstract/36/2/101/94