 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
ZHANG Zhi-yuan
Full-Text PDF
XML 173 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2024.09.007
Beijing Internatioanal Stuides University, Beijing, China
Based on the theory of stance in interactive linguistics and the corpus of Bridging Cultures, this paper studies the stance-taking of advanced oral English. By using a combination of quantitative and qualitative research to sort out and analyze the advanced oral corpus, the research finding suggests that people mainly use adjectives to express positive and negative stances, followed by nouns and verbs. Among the many grammatical constructions to express stances, “sub +is +adj” is the dominant structure, followed by “adv +adj”. It mainly presents four kinds of stance-taking in advanced oral English based on Bridging Cultures teaching materials: (1) Positively evaluation stance-taking; (2) positive attitude stance-taking; (3) negative evaluation stance-taking; and (4) negative attitude stance-taking.
teaching materials, advanced oral English, stance-taking
Journal of Literature and Art Studies, September 2024, Vol. 14, No. 9, 783-793
Berman, R. A., Ragnarsdóttir, H., & Strömqvist, S. (2002). Discourse stance: Written and spoken language. Written Language and Literacy, (5), 255-290.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, (11), 34.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 56-73). Oxford: Oxford University Press..
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjetivity, evaluation, interaction (p. 163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Englebretson, R. (Ed.). (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: Subjetivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139-182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Haddington, P. (2005). The intersubjectivity of stance taking in talk-in-interaction (English Department, University of Oulu: Oulu University Press).
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
Jaffe, A. (Ed.). (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 29-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz and S .C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407-437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.