Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China

ABSTRACT

The Chinese Civil Code has added the rule that an unfavorable party may request renegotiation in change of circumstances. However, the existing doctrines characterizing renegotiation as an obligation of performance, an obligation to oneself, or a collateral obligation are not reasonable. And the doctrine of the right to renegotiate is even more contrary to the civil law system. Renegotiation does not promote private autonomy and the principle “pacta sunt servanda”, as might be expected, but rather may lead to a greater bargaining advantage for the party benefiting from the change of circumstances and increase judicial costs. The need for renegotiation cannot be justified from the perspective of legal economics and comparative law. A change of circumstances does not necessarily require renegotiation, and how to renegotiate and the consequences of not renegotiating are not clear in the current legal system. Renegotiation should be regarded as mere an appeal from the law and removed from the discussion of rights and obligations.

KEYWORDS

renegotiation, change of circumstances, adaptation of the contract, appeal from the law

Cite this paper

References

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]