![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Epoché as the Breakthrough of the Natural Attitude
Maurizio Trudu
Full-Text PDF
XML 211 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5313/2024.03.005
Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
The following contribution aims to interpret the methodical device of Husserl’s epoché in light of the concept of breakthrough. Since the epoché is a theoretical device directed towards the suspension of the natural attitude, I will first attempt to define the concept of natural attitude. Subsequently, I will seek to understand the rich meaning of the concept of epoché. Finally, I will explore how this element is related to the concept of breakthrough. In other words, I will endeavour to clarify how the epoché determines a breakthrough of the natural attitude, which is not to be understood as “annihilation” or “destruction” but as a traversal.
Edmund Husserl, epoché, natural attitude, phenomenology
Maurizio Trudu. (2024). Epoché as the Breakthrough of the Natural Attitude. Philosophy Study, May-June 2024, Vol. 14, No. 3, 138-144.
Biceaga, V. (2010). The concept of passivity in Husserl’s phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Brudzińska, J. (2020). Bi-Valenz der Erfahrung. Dordrecht: Springer.
Conrad-Martius, H. (1959). Edmund Husserl 1859-1959. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Drummond, J. (1990). Husserlian intentionality and non-foundational realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gurwitsch, A. (1941). A non-egological conception of consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1(3), 325-338.
Gurwitsch, A. (1957). Le champ de la conscience. Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer.
Husserl, E. (1956). Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erste Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. In Husserliana VII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1959). Erste Philosophie (1923/4). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. In Husserliana VIII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1973a). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. In Husserliana I. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1973b). Die Idee der Phänomenologie. In Husserliana II. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1973c). Ding und Raum. Vorlesungen 1907. In Husserliana XVI. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1973d). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. In Husserliana XIII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1974). Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. In Husserliana XVII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1976a). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie. In Husserliana IIIa. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1976b). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie.
Kern I., (1962). Die drei Wege zur transzendental-phänomenologischen Reduktion in der Philosophie Husserls. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 24(2), 303-349.
Mohanty, J. N., & McKenna, W. (eds.). (1989). Husserl’s phenomenology: A textbook. Lanham: University Press of America.
Ryle, G. (1990). Phenomenology. In Critical essays. Bristol: Thoemes.
Schuhmann, K. (1973). Die Diaketik der Phänomenologie. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Schwabe-Hansen, E. (1991). Das Verhältnis von transzendentaler und konkreter Subjektivität in der Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls. Oslo, Munich: Solum/Fink.
Staiti, A. (ed.). (2015). Commentary on Husserl’s “Ideas I”. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Ströker, E. (ed.). (1979). Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls. Frankfurt/M.: Klostermann.
Wehrle, M. (2013). Horizonte der Aufmerksamkeit. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.