Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a course designed to develop Chinese English-major undergraduates’ academic language competence. Participants were from one intact class of 28 senior students of English-major. Students’ research article (RA) writings of one semester were collected as the main data. Findings of the study show that academic linguistic features and structure can be learned and transferred through the mediating tools: (a) the exemplars of sample RAs; (b) teacher’s demonstration, feedback, and mini-training sessions; and (c) genre and norms of RAs. This study is believed to shed new light on English RA writing teaching practices to Chinese EFL learners.

KEYWORDS

academic language competence, Activity Theory

Cite this paper

US-China Foreign Language, June 2024, Vol. 22, No. 6, 329-335 doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2024.06.004

References

Buckingham, L. (2008). Development of English academic writing competence by Turkish scholars. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 1-18.

Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 17-30.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 127-150.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). Language and education. J. J. Weber, (Ed.). (The 9th volume of a series of the Collected Works of M. A. Halliday). London/New York: Continuum.

Jarvis, J., & Robinson, M. (1997). Analysing educational discourse: An exploratory study of teacher response and support to pupil’s learning. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 212-228.

Konold, K. E., Miller, S. P., & Konold, K. B. (2004). Using teacher feedback to enhance student learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(6), 64-69.

Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29(2), 417-447.

Silva, T., & Brice, C. (2004). Research in teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 70-106.

Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic writing. In D. R. Olson and N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stern, L. A., & Solomon, A. (2006). Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled. Assessing Writing, 11, 22-41.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]