 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
LI Qin-yao
Full-Text PDF
XML 5 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2024.06.013
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
At the present stage, China’s higher education has experienced continuous reform and enhancement, the scale of education has jumped to the forefront, and the quality of education has been continuously improved, which has made gratifying achievements. The development of China’s higher education has entered the critical node of improving quality and efficiency, and the importance of quality management as the central link in improving the quality of higher education is self-evident. Accreditation as an effective means of quality assurance, in Germany and the United States has formed a mature and perfect system and procedures. Therefore, analysing and learning from the quality management system of higher education in Germany and the United States has an important reference value for promoting the further development of quality management of higher education in China.
accreditation systems, quality management in higher education, Germany, USA
Journal of Literature and Art Studies, June 2024, Vol. 14, No. 6, 491-508
AKKREDITIERUNGSRAT.
Gesetz zur Errichtung einer Stiftung “Stiftung zur Akkreditierung von
Studiengängen in Deutschland [EB/OL].[2013-10-17].
http://www.akkreditierungsrat.de/fileadmin/Seiteninhalte/AR/Beschluesse/ASG_Stiftungsgesetz.pdf.
Callan, P. M. (1994). Government and higher education. In A. Levine, (Ed.), Higher education learning 1980-2000 (pp. 3-19). Baltimore: Oxford University Press.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). (1999). Quality review. CHEA Almanac of External Quality Review. Washington, D.C.: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
Glidden, R. (1998). The Contemporary context of accreditation: Challenges in a changing environment. Keynote Address for 2nd Council for Higher Education Accreditation Conference, June. 25.
Hermann, R., & Akkreditierungsverfahren, D. (2005). In F. Bretschneider and J. Wildt, (Hrsg.), Handbuch Akkreditierung von Studiengängen. Eine Einführung für Hochschule, Politik und Berufspraxis (pp. 145-150). Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
Schade, A., & Akkreditierungsverfahren, D. (2005). In F. Bretschneider and J. Wildt, (Hrsg.), Handbuch Akkreditierung von Studiengängen. Eine Einführung für Hochschule, Politik und Berufspraxis (pp. 125-130). Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
Trow, M. (1994). Federalism in the American higher education. In A. Levine, (Ed.), Higher education learning 1980-2000 (pp. 39-66). Baltimore: Oxford University Press.
方峥. (2014). 《华盛顿协议》签约成员工程教育认证制度之比较. 高教发展与评估, 30(04), 66-76+119.
李亚东, 朱伟文. (2019). 从“跟随”到“领跑”: 高等教育专业认证发展道路探析——基于德国认证体系及ASIIN专业认证的因素分析与启示. 比较教育研究, 41(05), 50-57.