Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
XUE Qianqiang,LI Fengying
Full-Text PDF
XML 9 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2024.04.003
Affiliation(s)
Minzu University of China, Beijing, China
ABSTRACT
Whether
to introduce a general liability system for directors to third parties has
always been a focal point of controversy in the revision of the “Company Law”. From a global perspective,
only a few countries such as Japan and South Korea have established this system, and China’s attitude towards it has
also gone through multiple transformations
from rejection to tolerance, acceptance, and recognition. In fact, starting
from the overall social interest, the introduction of this system has important
theoretical and practical significance. It can be seen that China has made bold
attempts to establish general rules for directors’ liability to third parties,
but the relevant debates have not stopped. At present, it is necessary to
clarify the nature, scope, and form of this liability, and to design a
compatible system with other rules to fundamentally achieve the original
intention of the system.
KEYWORDS
director, liability to third parties, China’s new “Company Law”
Cite this paper
References