 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
TSAI Meng-ying
HSU Wan-chi
WANG En-tong
Full-Text PDF
XML 362 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5542/2023.10.002
Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China
Lee-Ming Institute of Technology, Taiwan, China
Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China
In recent years, many scholars have discussed good corporate culture, such as corporate social responsibility. The study investigates the relationship between employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and happiness in China’s resort industry. Four types of corporate social responsibilities are economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary. The study is an empirical study conducted to survey full-time workers who are working in Disney Resort, China. 257 effective samples have been collected. The result implicated that the Disney Resort employees’ corporate social responsibility perception positively affects happiness. Economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary responsibility all positively affect happiness.
corporate social responsibility perception, happiness, resort industry
Psychology Research, October 2023, Vol. 13, No. 10, 469-475
Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Deaton, A., & Roulet, A. (2016). Creative destruction and subjective well-being. American Economic Review, 106(12), 3869-3897.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory & the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Benjamin, D. J., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M. S., & Rees-Jones, A. (2012). What do you think would make you happier? What do you think you would choose? American Economic Review, 102(5), 2083-2110.
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why & how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47, 9-25.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment & job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972-992.
Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R. L. (1975). Business & society: Environment & responsibility. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dessler, G. (1980). Human behavior: Improving performance at work.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
Fombrun, C., & Stanley, M. (1990). The determinants of corporate reputation. Academy Management Journal, 33, 233-58.
Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169-216.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity & self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper and Bros.
Hsieh, Y., & Chan, J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: A concern among employees. Human Systems Management, 31, 219-230.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national wellbeing accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429-434.
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe & the US: Insights from businesses self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497514.
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good… and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from https://www.econbiz.de/Record/does-it-pay-to-be-good-and-does-it-matter-a-meta-analysis-of-the-relationship-between-corporate-social-and-financial-performance-margolis-joshua/10013067850
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social & financial performance: A metaanalysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., & Bill, J. B. (1997). Corporate image: Employee reactions & implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 401-412.
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158-166.
Smith, P. C. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. Chicago: Rand Mcnally.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance & organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, & cooperative behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349-361.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. (2015). Employee well‐being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross‐cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621-644.