Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the perspectives of Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) students studying at Korean universities on argumentative writing. Thematic analysis and MAXQDA2022 software examine data collected via an online open-ended questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Students’ approaches to supporting assertions, preferences for sentence structures and terminology, tactics for answering counterarguments, obstacles in different areas of argumentative writing, and overall impressions of argumentative essays are the focus of the research topics. Several significant themes and patterns emerge from the findings, including the significance of supporting statements with evidence, the preference for simple language structures and terminology, minimal engagement with counterarguments, and the difficulties encountered in the introduction, body, and conclusion parts. The policy and language education implications are examined, emphasizing the importance of instructional assistance, vocabulary-building initiatives, critical thinking integration, scaffolded writing instruction, and the use of technology. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the demands of Iranian EFL students and can help guide the creation of successful argumentative writing instruction. More study is needed to investigate new tactics and interventions to improve argumentative writing skills and boost EFL students’ academic achievement.

KEYWORDS

Iranian EFL students, argumentative writing, contextual factors, thematic analysis, semi-structured interview

Cite this paper

US-China Foreign Language, September 2023, Vol. 21, No. 9, 353-365 doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2023.09.002

References

Abdollahzadeh, E., Amini Farsani, M., & Beikmohammadi, M. (2017). Argumentative writing behavior of graduate EFL learners. Argumentation, 31, 641-661.

Akbari, Z. (2015). Current challenges in teaching/learning English for EFL learners: The case of junior high school and high school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 394-401.

Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88-103.

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120-123.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Farrugia, B. (2019). WASP (write a scientific paper): Sampling in qualitative research. Early Human Development, 133, 69-71.

Ghanbari, N., & Salari, M. (2022). Problematizing argumentative writing in an Iranian EFL undergraduate context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 862400.

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory & practice of writing. London & New York: Longman.

Hashemifardnia, A., Shafiee, S., Esfahani, F. R., & Sepehri, M. (2021). Effects of massive open online course (MOOC) on Iranian EFL Learners’ speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 22(1), 56-79.

Li, H. H., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Investigating effects of small-group student talk on the quality of argument in Chinese tertiary English as a foreign language learners’ argumentative writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 868045.

Mallahi, O. (2022). Investigating the strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners while writing summaries in academic contexts. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 28, 1-30.

Marnİ, S., & Harsİatİ, T. (2019). Critical thinking patterns of first-year students in an argumentative essay. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 683-697.

Nimehchisalem, V., Abbasi, M. M., Ebrahimzadeh, A., & Kalajahi, S. A. R. (2015). Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ argumentative writing performance in private language institutes. Asian Social Science, 11(15), 96.

Onoda, R., Miwa, S., & Akita, K. (2015). Highlighting effect: The function of rebuttals in written argument. EAPCogSci. Retrieved from https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1419/paper0025.pdf

Ozfidan, B., & Mitchell, C. (2020). Detected difficulties in argumentative writing: The case of culturally and linguistically Saudi backgrounded students. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 15-29.

Rahmatunisa, W. (2014). Problems faced by Indonesian EFL learners in writing argumentative essays. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 41-49.

Rezai, A. (2022). Cultivating Iranian IELTS candidates’ writing skills through online peer feedback: A mixed-methods inquiry. Education Research International, Article 6577979.

Saputra, A. B. B., & Jumariati, E. R. F. (2021). EFL students’ problems in writing argumentative essays. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icella-21/125961961

Siregar, R. N., Syarif, H., & Amri, Z. (2021). An analysis of the argument of students’ argumentative essays by using the Toulmin model. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icoelt-8-20/125960876

Taheri, P., & Nazmi, R. (2021). Improving EFL learners’ argumentative writing ability: Teacher vs. peer scaffolding. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 299-333.

Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701.

Tikupasang, O., Hardiyanti, S., & Arman, A. (2022). EFL student’s difficulties toward IELTS writing task 2. AMCA Journal of Education and Behavioral Change, 2(1), 28-31.

Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study on scaffolding Chinese university students’ English argumentative writing based on the Toulmin model. Heliyon, 8(12), e12199.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]