![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Interpretation of Lawrence’s Poetry from the Perspective of Ecocriticism Theory
LI Chun-feng
Full-Text PDF
XML 432 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2023.02.001
School of Foreign Languages, Taizhou University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China
Based on ecocriticism theory, this paper is to conduct a comprehensive discussion of Lawrence’s poetry from three aspects: natural ecology, social ecology and spiritual ecology, to explore the profound ecological philosophical implications contained in Lawrence’s poetry, and to expand the breadth and depth of the ecocriticism interpretation of Lowe’s poetry research.
ecocriticism, D. H. Lawrence, natural ecology, social ecology, spiritual ecology
Journal of Literature and Art Studies, February 2023, Vol. 13, No. 2, 61-67
Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.) (1996). The ecocriticism read-er: Landmarks in literary ecology. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
Lawrence, D. H. (2002). The complete poems of D. H. Lawrence. Ware: Wordsworth Editions Ltd..
Lawrence, D. H. (2008). Birds, beasts and flowers. Boston: David R. Godine.
Liu, H. T. (2007). Wasteland and salvation: Lawrence’s novels in a modern context. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Lu, S. Y. (1996). Literature, art and the age of ecology—Also on the “sphere of the earth spirit”. Academic Monthly, (5), 3-11.
Lu, S. Y. (2000). Ecological literature and art. Xi’an: Shaanxi People’s Education Press.
Manhood, M. M. (2008). The poet as botanist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miao, F. G. (2007). Lawrence from the perspective of ecocriticism. Shanghai: Press of Shanghai University.
Perkins, D. (1979). A history of modern poetry. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Simpson, H. (1982). D. H. Lawrence and feminism. London: Croom Helm Ltd..
Wang, J. F. (1997). Modern British history. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.
Yan, J. H. (2013). Ecological perspective of Lawrence’s poetry. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.