 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Francesco Paolo R. Marino and Filiberto Lembo
Full-Text PDF
XML 518 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2022.07.002
School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Potenza 85100, Italy
The contemporary interest, on one hand for a renewed relationship between city and natural landscape, on the other for settlement typologies intrinsically efficient from an energy standpoint took back the attention on the design of the dug city, or rather, almost completely excavated. This is an emblematic model of the requirement that deals with the factors of its environment, like sun, wind, ground, shadow and flora, forcing some designers to migrate from usual design methodologies, indifferent to these design parameters, and they are careful only to the “laws of form”, in search of criteria and fine calculation tools to optimize the configuration and the structure of buildings, in order to ensure that they can be managed as “passively” as possible. What it means, with the minimum contribution of plants to ensure the best satisfaction of comfort and psychological needs of users: not only lighting, sunbathing, ventilation, thermal comfort in summer and winter, acoustic comfort, but also view characteristics, quality of lighting and sociological aspects. In general dialectic between artifice and nature, the theme of dug architecture today is faced not only as one of the most interesting and rich suggestions, but also as one of those, in which the reflection on objectives, methodologies and tools is longer necessary, to the identification of a new way of urban living and effective solutions against energy consumption.
Semi-underground typologies, earth-sheltered houses thermal insulation choices, design models for dug cities, sustainable city planning.
[1] Marino, F. P. R. 2005. “The Rock Civilisation—Hypogeum House Typologies to Renew a Millenarian Tradition of Settlements in Puglia and Basilicata (Italy).” In Proceedings of AEEA International Conference, October 26-29, 2005, Bucharest, Romania.
[2] Fonseca, C. D., and Lembo, F. 1977. “Il Centro Storico di Massafra.” Annali of the University of Studies, Faculty of Humanities. Lecce: Adriatica Editrice Salentina. (in Italian)
[3] Fonseca, C. D., and D’Angela, C., eds. 1989. “La struttura urbanistica del ‘Casale Ruptum’.” In Casalrotto I—la storia, gli scavi. Galatina: Congedo Editore. (in Italian)
[4] Lembo, F., Marino, F. P. R., and Calcagno, C. 2011. “Semi-underground House Model as New Concept for Urban Sustainable Environment.” Procedia Engineering 21: 570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2052.
[5] Lembo, F., and Marino, F. P. R. 2013. “Semi-underground Buildings: Design Models for the Contemporary Cities.” In Advances in Underground Space Development, Proceedings of ACUUS 2012 Congress, edited by Zhou, C., and Sterling. New York: Research Publishing, pp. 139-49. doi: 10.3850/ 978-981-07-3757-3_RP-111-P154.
[6] Lembo, F. 2005. “La vita in grotta: le tipologie, le morfologie e le caratteristiche costruttive.” In Puglia tra grotte e borghi, Atti del II° Convegno Internazionale sulla civiltà rupestre, November 24-26, 2005, Savelletri di Fasano (BR), Italy. (in Italian)
[7] Forowicz, T. 1995. “The Influence of Climate on the Heat Transfer from Earth-Sheltered Buildings.” In Proceedings of IBPSA 4th International Conference, edited by Mitchell, J. W., and Beckman, W. A., August 14-16, 1995, Madison, WI, USA.
[8] Stantec, M., and Nowak, H. 2011. “Analysis of the Earth-Sheltered Buildings’ Heating and Cooling Energy Demand Depending on Type of Soil.” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 11 (1): 221-35. doi: 10.1016/ S1644-9665(12)60185-X.
[9] Avanza, F., Calchi Novati, S., Conta, S., and De Munari, S. 1991. Progettare il sottosuolo. Milano: Franco Angeli.
[10] Lembo, F., and Marino, F. P. R. 2007. “‘Diversity’ in Typo-Technological Choices for Hypogeum Architecture.” In Proceedings of “XXXV IAHS World Congress on Housing Science”, September 4-7, 2007, Melbourne, Australia. ISBN 978-1-921166-68-6.
[11] Lembo, F., and Marino, F. P. R. 2014. “Typological Choices for Underground Architecture.” In Proceedings of ACUUS 2014—14th World Conference on Underground Space: Planning, Administration and Design Challenges, September 24-26, 2014, Korea Institute of Building Construction (KIC), Seoul, Korea, pp. 424-9.