Bandura’s Social Learning Theory and Its Importance in the Organizational Psychology Context

This systematic review is focused on the importance of the Bandura Social Cognitive Theory and its theoretical components such as self-efficacy in workplace of today. The themes have been described through the course of the decades. These theories have been utilized heavily in research and real-life case studies, have been further developed by Bandura and other researchers, and have been implemented in organizational psychology. During the past 10 years they have helped in reshaping Human Resources Development. Major latest contributions and applications are discussed touching even the recent outbreak of the pandemic. The influence of the theory is immense and the importance of self-efficacy in the workplace has been addressed and proven by research.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Bandura, A. (1989). Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 19-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87

Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002

Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Responses to voice in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 851-922.

Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (2013). Handbook of personality at work (applied psychology series). New York: Routledge.

Davidson, F. (Producer), & Davidson, J. (Director). (2003). Bandura’s social cognitive theory: An introduction. Davidson Films. Retrieved from https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/bandura-s-social-cognitive-theory-an-introduction

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1013-1034.

Gibson, S. K. (2004). Social learning (cognitive) theory and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 193-210. Retrieved from https://doi-org.acg.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1523422304263429

Goldstein, A. P., & Sorcher, M. (1974). Changing supervisory behavior. New York: Pergamon.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 14(1), 1-6.

Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr., H. P. (Jan. 1981). Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 105-113. doi:10.5465/AMR.1981.4288021

Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1-13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.002

Stajkovic, A. D., Bandura, A., Locke, E. A., Lee, D., & Sergent, K. (2018). Test of three conceptual models of influence of the big five personality traits and self-efficacy on academic performance: A meta-analytic path-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 238-245. Retrieved from https://doi-org.acg.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.014

Tims, M., & Bakker, A.B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 36(2), Art. #841, 9 pages. DOI: 10.4102/ sajip.v36i2.841

Tudge, J. R., & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36(2), 61-81.

Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Peeters, M. C. (2015). The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self-efficacy, and affective well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(3), 511-532. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12128

Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279067

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4378011