![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Dowry System and Natural Law in Shakespeare
HUANG Yan-li
Full-Text PDF
XML 534 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2022.02.005
Southwest University, Chongqing, China; College of Foreign Languages, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie, Guizhou Province, China
Dowry was an important even decisive factor of forming a marriage in Renaissance, which was illustrated in Shakespeare’s plays. “No dowry, no marriage” was a common social phenomenon in Europe. Dowry was essentially a way of the actualization of male power in the context of patriarchal society, and the dowry system in Renaissance provided a unique angle to observe the social and family relationships, and the conflict between marriage freedom of children and actualization of parental power at that time. Shakespeare’s arrangement of dowry and marriage shows his satire to the unreasonable existing law. Actually we can find his inclination for natural law and consistence with Pufendorf who believes that family is the primary form of society, and marriage is the most primitive form of socialization, which is the requirement of natural law.
Dowry, Shakespeare, Pufendorf, natural law
Journal of Literature and Art Studies, February 2022, Vol. 12, No. 2, 150-159
Cressey, D. (1997). Birth, marriage, and death: Ritual, religion, and the life-cycle in tudor and Stuart England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dean, T., & Lowe, K. J. P. (Eds.). (1998). Marriage in Italy, 1300-1650. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.
Ferraro, J. M. (2001). Marriage wars in late renaissance venice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Flandrin, J.-L. (1979). Families in former times (R. Southern, Trans.). London: Cambridge University Press.
Gouge, W. (2006). Of domestical duties. G. Fox (Ed.). London: Chapel Library.
Greenblatt, S. (2001). Shakespearean negociation.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Grubb, J. S. (1996). Provincial families of the renaissance: Private and public life in the Veneto. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ingram, M. (1990). Church courts, sex and marriage in England, 1570-1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, M. L. (1991). Women of the renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Orgel, S., & Braunmuller, A. R. (Eds.). (2002). The complete pelican Shakespeare (p. xlvi), New York: Penguin Group.
Panizza, L. (Ed.) (2000). Women in Italian renaissance culture and society. New York: Modern Humanities Research Association and Routledge.
Pufendorf, S. (1991). On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law (M. Silverthorne, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raffield, P., & Watt, G. (Eds.). (1988). Shakespeare and the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Robin, D., & Laesen, A. R. (Eds.). (2007). Encyclopedia of women in the renaissance. Santa Barbara:-ABC-CLIO, Inc.
Sokol, B. J., & Sokol, M. (Eds.). (2003). Shakespeare, law and marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Young, B. W. (2009). Family life in the age of Shakespeare. Westport: Greenwood Press.
《马克思恩格斯全集》第六卷. (1961). 北京: 人民出版社.