Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi 67100, Greece

ABSTRACT

Buildings are stationary, complex edifices which come in a variety of sizes and shapes of comparatively low value goods. Their building materials are not readily reused or recycled as can not be easily separated and utilized without further processing. This reprocessing takes place at almost every step of a material cycle and requires energy inputs, where together with energy come the carbon dioxide emissions that make up the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions the main cause of global warming. If components and materials are recovered from a building for reuse, the additional inputs are eliminated and it is easier to adapt or change the building to meet evolving functions over its lifetime. Treating the buildings efficiently at the end of their service life can hold significant economic and environmental value. However, the value that can be extracted is very much dependent on how the buildings have been designed and built. This is the role of Design for Deconstruction (DfD), the intentional design of buildings in order to make them easily deconstructable and reuse their intact building materials and components in other building. Due to the perception of designers that buildings are static constructions the DfD is not widely used and only a limited number of buildings are fully deconstructable. This paper looks at the DfD process and identifies the four key categories involved in the process. These categories play an important role in the construction industry to become more sustainable, smarter and resourceful, by maximizing the reuse potential of DfD process.

KEYWORDS

Reuse, DfD, sustainable built environment, construction industry.

Cite this paper

Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 15 (2021) 459-468 doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2021.09.002

References

[1]       European Environment Agency (EEA). 2015. Towards a More Urban World.” https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/
2015/global/urban-world
.

[2]       WEF. 2016. “Shaping the Future of Construction a Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Construction_report_020516.pdf.

[3]       Arup. 2016. “Circular Economy in the Built Environment.” https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/ section/circular-economy-in-the-built-environment.

[4]       UN Environment Programme. 2020. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. Towards a Zero-Emissions, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector.https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/2020%20Buildings%20GSR_FULL%20REPORT.pdf.

[5]       Crowther, P. 2014. Investigating Design for Disassembly through Creative Practice.” Presented at Inter-sections International Symposium, Florence, Italy.

[6]       EEA. 2012. Material Resources and Waste—2012 Update. The European Environment-State and Outlook. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency (EEA).

[7]       ECORYS. 2014. Resource Efficiency in the Building Sector.” https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/Resource %20efficiency%20in%20the%20building%20sector.pdf.

[8]       Dixit, M. K., Fernández-Solís, J. L., Lavy, S., and Culp, C. H. 2010. “Identification of Parameters for Embodied Energy Measurement: A Literature Review.” Energy Build 42 (8): 1238-47.

[9]       Giesekam, J., Barrett, J., Taylor, P., and Owen, A. 2014. “The Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Options for Materials Used in UK Construction.” Energy Build 78 (Aug.): 202-14.

[10]    UN. 2013. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision.” United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, US.

[11]    OECD. 2014. OECD. StatExtracts, Economic Outlook No 95 – May 2014 – Long-term Baseline Projections.” Accessed July, 2021.

[12]    Kharas, H. 2010. The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries.” OECD Development Centre, Working Paper No. 285, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

[13]    Crowther, P. 2005. Design for Disassembly—Themes and Principles; RAIA/BDP Environment Design Guide. Queentown, Australia: The Royal Australian Institute of Architects.

[14]    Guy, B., and Shell, S. 2002. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. In Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39-Deconstruction Meeting.

[15]    Dorsthorst, B., and Kowalczyk, T. 2005. Report 5—State of Deconstruction in the Netherlands. In Deconstruction and Materials Reuse—An International Overview. Rotterdam, Netherlands: In-House Publishing.

[16]    Webster, M. D., and Costello, D. 2005. Designing Structural Systems for Deconstruction: How to Extend a New Building’s Useful Life and Prevent It from Going to Waste When the End Finally Comes.” Presented at Greenbuild Conference, Atlanta, GA.

[17]    Gorgolewski, M. 2008. Designing with Reused Building Components: Some Challenges. Build Res. Inf. 36 (2): 175-88.

[18]    Crowther, P. 2002. Design for Buildability and the Deconstruction Consequences. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse.” In Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39-Deconstruction Meeting.

[19]    Guy, B., and McLendon, S. 2002. Building Deconstruction: Reuse and Recycling of Building Materials. Gainesville, Florida, USA: Center for Construction and Environment, University of Florida. http://www.recyclecddebris.com/rCDd/Resources/CaseStudies.aspx.

[20]    Crowther, P. 2009. Design for Disassembly in Newton.” In Technology, Design and Process Innovation in the Built Environment, edited by Newton, P., Hampson, P., and Drogemuller, R. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 224-37.

[21]    Durmisevic, E., and Yeang, K. 2009. Designing for Disassembly (DfD). Architectural Design 79 (6): 134-7.

[22]    Crowther, P. 2014. Assembly and Disassembly of Temporary Public Spaces: Establishing the Theoretical Needs. Presented at International Conference on Art, Architecture and Urban Design.

[23]    Kibert, C. J. 2003. Deconstruction: The Start of a Sustainable Materials Strategy for the Built Environment.” Industry and Environment 26 (2-3): 84-8.

[24]    Akinade, O. O., Oyedele, L. O., Omoteso, K., Ajayi, S. O., Bilal, M., Owolabi, H. A., Alaka, H. A., Ayris, L., and John Henry, L. 2017. “BIM-Based Deconstruction Tool: Towards Essential Functionalities.” International Journal of Sustainable Built 6 (1): 260-71.

[25]    Guy, B., and Ciarimboli, N. 2008. DfD: Design for Disassembly in the Built Environment: A Guide to Closed-Loop Design and Building. Hamer Center.

[26]    Sassi, P. 2008. Defining Closed-Loop Material Cycle Construction. Build. Res. Inf. 36: 509-19.

[27]    Crowther, P. 2005. Design for Disassembly—Themes and Principle. RAIA/BDP Environment Design Guide 2: 1-7.

[28]    Jensen, G. K., and Sommer, J. 2016. Building a Circular Future. Copenhagen, Denmark: 3XN.

[29]    Tingley, D. D. 2012. Design for Deconstruction: An Appraisal.” PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.

[30]    Chini, A. R., and Balachandran, S. 2002. Anticipating and Responding to Deconstruction through Building Design.” In Des. Deconstruction Mater. Reuse. CIB Publ. 272.

[31]    Chini, A. R., and Bruening, S. 2003. Deconstruction and Materials Reuse in the United States. The Future of Sustainable Construction Special Issue Article.

[32]    Jaillon, L., and Poon, C. 2010. “    . Constr. Manag. Econ. 28: 1025-42.

[33]    Brand, S. 1995. How Buildings Learn: What Happens after They’re Built. New York: Penguin Books.

[34]    Morgan, C., and Stevenson, F. 2005. Design for Deconstruction SEDA Design Guides for Scotland. No. 1.

[35]    Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P., and Lim, M. K. 2018. “The Use of Smart Technologies in Enabling Construction Components Reuse: A Viable Method or a Problem Creating Solution?J. Environ. Manag. 216 (Aug.): 214-23.

[36]    Addis, W., and Schouten, J. 2004. Design for ReconstructionPrinciples of Design to Facilitate Reuse and Recycling. London: CIRIA.

[37]    Chilton, J. 2009. Designing Structures for Deconstruction. Construction Information Quarterly 11 (3): 127.

[38]    Kanters, J. 2018. Design for Deconstruction in the Design Process: State of the Art.” Buildings 8 (11): 150.

[39]    Couto, A., and Couto, J. P. 2010. Guidelines to Improve Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Portugal. In Process Management, edited by Pomffyova, M.

[40]    Hechler, O., Larsen, O. P., and Nielsen, S. 2012. Design for Deconstruction. Malta: European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST).

[41]    Leroux, K., and Seldman, N. 2000. Deconstruction: Salvaging Yesterday’s Buildings for Tomorrow’s Sustainable Communities. Institute for Local Self-Reliance and Materials for the Future Foundation, Washington, DC.

[42]    Leigh, N. G., and Patterson, L. M. 2006. Deconstructing to Redevelop: A Sustainable Alternative to Mechanical Demolition: The Economics of Density Development Finance and Pro Formas. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72 (2): 217-25.

[43]    Iacovidou, E., and Purnell, P. 2016. Mining the Physical Infrastructure: Opportunities, Barriers and Interventions in Promoting Structural Components Reuse. Science of the Total Environment (557-558): 791-807.

[44]    Rios, F. C., Chong, W. K., and Grau, D. 2015. Design for Disassembly and Deconstruction—Challenges and Opportunities.Procedia Engineering 118: 1296-304.

[45]    Arup, CIOB. 2013. Sir Ian Dixon Scholarship Designing for the Deconstruction Process. Final Report.

[46]    Da Rocha, C. G., and Sattler, M. A. 2009. A Discussion on the Reuse of Building Components in Brazil: An Analysis of Major Social, Economical and Legal Factors. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54 (2): 104-12.

[47]    Bradly, G., and Shell, S. 2002. Design for Deconstruction and Material Reuse.” In Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39-Deconstruction Meeting.

[48]    Rodríguez, G., Alegre, F. J., and Martínez, G. 2007. “The Contribution of Environmental Management Systems to the Management of Construction and Demolition Waste: The Case of the Autonomous Community of Madrid (Spain).Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 50 (3): 334-49.

[49]    Wahlström, M., Laine-Ylijoki, J., Järnström, H., Kaartinen, T., Erlandsson, M., Cousins, A. P., Wik, O., Suer, P., Oberender, A., Hjelmar, O., Birgisdottir, H., Butera, S., Astrup, T. F., and Jørgensen, A. 2014. Environmentally Sustainable Construction Products and Materials—Assessment of Release and Emissions.” Nordic Innovation, Oslo, Norway.

[50]    Oyedele, L. O., Ajayi, S. O., and Kadiri, K. O. 2014. Use of Recycled Products in UK Construction Industry: An Empirical Investigation into Critical Impediments and Strategies for Improvement. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 93 (Dec.): 23-31.

[51]    Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., and Kadiri, K. O. 2015. “Waste Effectiveness of the Construction Industry: Understanding the Impediments and Requisites for Improvements. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 102: 101-12.

[52]    Lu, W., and Yuan, H. 2010. Exploring Critical Success Factors for Waste Management in Construction Projects of China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55 (2): 201-8.

[53]    Häkkinen, T., and Belloni, K. 2011. Barriers and Drivers for Sustainable Building.Build. Res. Inf. 39 (3): 239-55.

[54]    Schweber, L. 2013. The Effect of BREEAM on Clients and Construction Professionals.Build. Res. Inf. 41 (2): 129-45.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]