Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

İstanbul Ayvansaray University, İstanbul, Turkey

ABSTRACT

It is possible to say that the automotive industries of Brazil and Turkey have developed as assembly industries and show great similarities in this context. In the 1980s, in line with the development direction of the world’s automotive industry, Turkey tried to make the country’s investment environment attractive for foreign international companies to produce in the country. We can say that while Brazil created the state incentive system in order to attract foreign investments to its country since the 1950s, it tried to increase its dose with the 1990s. Although, like Turkey, Brazil has thought of producing local cars, the difference between Turkey and Brazil is that it has considered exporting and was able to export not only to South America, but also to African countries. Another difference of Brazil is that it has implemented incentive policies for the automotive sector and has been able to rearrange its incentive elements according to changing conditions. Turkey, on the other hand, has decided to return from the policy of attracting foreign investments to its country since 2006, and in 2011, it decided to produce domestic automobiles. As of December 2019, a prototype of the domestic car was produced by Turkey’s Automobile Initiative Group and work for mass production began. Thus, the problem of adaptation to electric vehicle production was tried to be overcome by moving to a new phase in the way of technology development. This approach was used by the South Korean automotive industry in the 1980s and it was successful and technology development capability was gained in a short time. In order to see the success of the application of this method in Turkey, it is thought that it is necessary to wait for the result of the domestic automobile project. Brazil, on the other hand, was able to rank high in world automotive industry production with its sectoral incentive policies that can adapt to changing conditions and its structure that considers exports from the past, while Turkey lagged behind.

KEYWORDS

automotive industry, lagging industries, gaining technology development capability, path dependency, domestic automobile

Cite this paper

Sociology Study, Sept.-Oct. 2021, Vol. 11, No. 5, 220-233

References

Cihan, A. (2014). Osmanlı’da Eğitim (Education in the Ottoman Empire). İstanbul: Akademik Kitaplar (Academic Books).

De Negri, F., & Rauen, A. T. (2018). Innovation policies in Brazil during 2000s: The need for new paths. Discussion Paper 235, Institute for Applied Economic Research (Ipea), Brasilia.

Dolanay, S. S. (2020). Çin Otomotiv Sanayinde 2000’li Yıllardaki Hızlı Yükseliş ve Türkiye Otomotiv Sanayinde Tarihsel Gelişim. Proceedings from III. International Conference on Empirical Economics and Social Sciences (e-ICEESS 2020). November 12-13, Bandırma, Turkey.

Dolanay, S. S. (2021a). Historical development of automotive industry at India and Turkey and the formation of innovative company. International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 4(1), 74-91.

Dolanay, S. S. (2021b). Rapid rise of China automotive industry in the 2000s and history of Turkey automotive industry. China-USA Business Review, 20(1), 46-64.

Dolanay, S. S. (2021c). Historical development in the automotive industries of Argentina and Turkey. Sociology Study, 11(2), 66-86.

Dolanay, S. S. (2021d). Brezilya ve Türkiye Otomotiv Sanayinde Tarihsel Gelişim (Historical development in the automotive industry of Brazil and Turkey). Proceedings from Online International Conference on Empirical Economics and Social Sciences (e-ICEESS’21). July 3-4, Bandırma, Turkey.

Dolanay, S. S., & Oğuztürk, B. S. (2018). Otomotiv Sanayinde Teknolojik Gelişme (Güney Kore-Türkiye) [Technological development at automotive industry (South Korea-Turkey)]. Ankara: Alter Yayınevi (Alter Publishing House).

Dolanay, S. S., & Oğuztürk, B. S. (2019). Ulusal Yenilik Sisteminin Bir Unsuru Olarak Araştırma Odaklı ve Girişimci Üniversite: Güney Kore ve Türkiye Örneği (Research oriented and entrepreneur university as an element of national innovation system: Samples of South Korea and Turkey). Proceedings from International Conference on Empirical Economics and Social Sciences (ICEESS). Bandırma.

Erdaş, S. (2015). Atatürk Dönemi Türk Ekonomisinde Yerel Sermaye Birikimi: Taşrada Kurulan Anonim Şirketler (1920-1938) [Local capital accumulation in the Turkish economy in the Atatürk era: Joint stock companies established in the country (1920-1938)]. Proceedings from Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin Ekonomik ve Sosyal Tarihi Uluslararası Sempozyumu (International Symposium on Economic and Social History of the Republic of Turkey). 26-28 Kasım (November 26-28).

Erdem, A. R. (2012). Atatürk’ün Liderliğinde Üniversite Reformu: Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Tarihimizde Dönüm Noktası (University reform under Atatürk’s leadership: A turning point in our history of higher education and science). Belgi Dergisi, 4, 376-388.

Ferrarini, A., Gaiger, L. I., & Veranese, M. (n.d.). Solidarity economy enterprises in Brazil: An overview from the second national mapping. Retrieved from https://blogecosol.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/icsem.pdf

Ferro, M. (2002). Fetihlerden Bağımsızlık Hareketlerine Sömürgecilik Tarihi 13. Yüzyıl-20. Yüzyıl (Colonial history from conquests to independence movements 13th century-20th century). Çeviren Cedden Muna (Translated by Cedden Muna). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayıncılık Paz. San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Şti., İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.

Göker, H. A. (2013). Yaratıcılık ve Yenilikçiliğin Kültürel Kökenleri ve Bizim Toplumumuz—Çözümleme Denemesi (Cultural roots of creativity and innovation and our society—An analysis essay). II. Sürüm (II. version). Retrieved from https://docplayer.biz.tr/348703-Yaraticilik-ve-yenilikciligin-kulturel-kokenleri-ve-bizim-toplumumuz.html

Gupta, N., Weber, C., Pena, V., Shipp, S. S., & Healey, D. (2013). Innovation policy of Brazil. IDA Paper 5039, Institute for Defence Analyses (IDA).

İnalcık, H. (2017). Osmanlı ve Modern Türkiye (Ottoman and modern Turkey). 5. Baskı (5th edition). İstanbul: TİMAŞ Yayınları (TİMAŞ Publication).

Keyder, Ç. (1993). Dünya Ekonomisi İçinde Türkiye (1923-1929) [Turkey in the world economy (1923-1929)]. İkinci Basım (Second edition). İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları (History Foundation Yurt Publishing), Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı Yayını (Turkish Economic and Social History Foundation Publication), Türkiye Araştırmaları (Turkey Studies).

Küçükerman, Ö. (2000). Anadolu Tasarım Mirasının Ayak İzlerinde: Türk Otomotiv Sanayi ve TOFAŞ (In the footprints of Anatolian design heritage: Turkish automotive industry and TOFAŞ). İstanbul: TOFAŞ ve FIAT (TOFAŞ and FIAT).

Marx, R., & De Mello, A. M. (2014). New initiatives, trends and dilemmas for the Brazilian automotive industry: The case of Inovar Auto and its impacts on electromobility in Brazil. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 14(2), 138-157.

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI). (2012). MCTI organizational chart. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Science,_Technology_and_Innovation_(Brazil)

Nahum, B. (1988). Koç’ta 44 Yılım: Bir Otomotiv Sanayi Kuruluyor (44 years in Koç: An automotive industry is established). İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları (Milliyet Publications).

Naritomi, J., Soares, R. R., & Assunçao, J. J. (2009). Institutional development and colonial heritage within Brazil. Discussion Paper No. 4276, IZA, Bonn, Germany.

Özilgen, M. (2009). Endüstrileşme Sürecinde Bilgi Birikiminin Öyküsü (The story of knowledge accumulation in the process of industrialization). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi (Friend Publishing House).

Pala, İ. (2019). İtiraf (Confession). 1. Basım (1st edition). İstanbul: Kapı Yayınları (Door Releases).

Pamuk, Ş. (1994). Osmanlı Ekonomisinde Bağımlılık ve Büyüme (1820-1913) [Dependency and growth in the Ottoman economy (1820-1913)]. Gözden Geçirilmiş 2. Baskı (Revised 2nd edition). İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı Yayınları (Turkish Economic and Social History Foundation Publications), Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları (History Foundation Yurt Publishing), Türkiye Araştırmaları (Turkey Studies).

Roett, R. (2011). The new Brazil. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Şimşek, M. (2006). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Endüstrileşme Maceramız Yarım Kalan Devrim Rüyası (Our republican era industrialization adventure. The unfinished revolutionary dream). 1. Basım (1st edition). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları 1684 (Alpha Publications 1684), İnceleme Araştırma 20 (Review Research 20).

Şimşek, M. (2020). Ben Devrim Beni Benden Dinleyin (I’m revolution listen to me). 1. Basım (1st edition). İstanbul: Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şirketi (Alfa Printing Publishing Distribution Industry and Trade Limited Company).

Zelyut, R. (2019). Osmanlı’da İdam Edilen Alimler Düşünceleri Yüzünden Ölüme Gidenler (Scholars executed in the Ottoman Empire, those who died because of their thoughts). 1. Baskı (1st edition). Ankara: Kripto Basım Yayım ve Dağıtım Ltd. Şti. (Crypto Printing Publishing and Distribution Limited Company).

Zengin, Z. S. (2002). Tevhid-i Tedrisat Kanunu’nun Hazırlanmasından Sonraki İlk Dönemde Uygulanışı ve Din Eğitimi (The implementation of the law of unification of education in the first period after its preparation and religious education). Dini Araştırmalar (Religious Studies), 5(13), 81-116.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]