Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
An Index for Measuring Aesthetic Perception of Shopping Building Frontages
Author(s)
Anita P. Yammiyavar1 and Madhumita Roy2
Full-Text PDF
XML 583 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2021.04.005
Affiliation(s)
1. Royal School of Architecture, Royal Global University, Guwahati, Assam 781035, India
2. Department of Architecture, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal 700054, India
ABSTRACT
Architects treat building frontages with careful attention
to aesthetic detail. The ability of a building’s frontage to draw attention is directly
proportional to its aesthetic perception resulting from the composition of its constituent
physical features. While deciding on the building’s
aesthetics is the architect’s prerogative, a
question arises as to on what basis can an architect compare various conceptual
designs and decide on the best option, considering the building users’ “likeability”
factor. Aesthetic perception ratings and rankings from 206 regular shoppers were
elicited. Further, 52 architects were asked to evaluate the aesthetics of these
ranked shopping buildings. Combining Architects’ Gestalt indices with Birkhoff’s
aesthetic measures as well as ranking weightages given by the
public, a frontage aesthetic perception index of likeability—FAPIL,
is proposed as an indexical aid for design decision making by architects. The findings
were elicited by giving due consideration to building users’ as
well as architect’s
judgement so that they can be embodied
into the design under conceptualization. Given
site and cost constraints faced by the architect, the architect needs to ensure
that the aesthetic features contributing to visual order be at least 2.3 times
those that contribute to visual complexity for
positive aesthetic perception of
a shopping building.
KEYWORDS
Shopping building frontage, aesthetics, perception, likeability index.
Cite this paper
References