Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Urban Planning and Inadequacies of Implementation: The Case of the City of Larissa, Greece
Author(s)
Maria Markatou
Full-Text PDF
XML 842 Views
DOI:10.17265/2162-5298/2020.05.004
Affiliation(s)
National and Technical University of Athens, School of Architecture, Athens, Greece
ABSTRACT
Urban planning in Greece is identified by two characteristics: the
domination of the legislative/legal level on the policy-making one, and the
“implementation gap” between laws and plans, and related implementations. In
fact, the most frequent reason for the implementation gap is the inability of
local administration to compensate landowners. An additional reason for the
non-implementation of Urban Plans is that if the expropriation/compensation is
delayed for more than a legally specified period, the landowner can ask the
lifting of the expropriation. Larissa faces such
difficulties. Due to lack of money for expropriations, its¾years-old Urban Plan has been implemented only
by 77%. In the city, there are nearly 120
of cases to be expropriated/compensated, and the total amount needed is
estimated to 150 million Euros. Obviously, the municipality is impossible to
afford this amount, and the Urban Plan is in serious risk of not being
implemented. In that context, the
paper suggests a re-examination and a re-classification of the prescribed
spaces based on three critical factors: the “urban importance” of each
“prescribed space”, the economic affordability of financing its expropriation,
and the legal characteristics of property rights.
KEYWORDS
City plan, expropriations, implementation, public space, urban planning.
Cite this paper
References