Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

ABSTRACT

Total Physical Response (TPR) method put forward by American psychology professor Asher advocates linking language and behavior, teaching the foreign language through body movements, and emphasizing teaching in real situations. Based on TPR method, this paper uses empirical research, literature reference, and questionnaire survey to explore problems of teachers and pupils in the traditional English teaching classroom. Compared to the traditional teaching method, TPR method in primary school English classroom greatly improves both teachers and students whether in teaching or in learning. In this research, 60 pupils from Class 3 and Class 4 in Qingtong Primary School in Huzhou City are taken as subjects, who are taught respectively by TPR method and the traditional teaching method. By contrast, the paper pinpoints advantages of TPR method and disadvantages of the traditional teaching method; by interviewing questionnaire and observation, it analyzes problems existing in English teaching from the perspectives of teachers and pupils and proposes some advice based on TPR method, meantime, stresses the combination of TPR method and other teaching methods according to different teaching situations and teaching objectives, in order to enhance the efficiency of teachers’ teaching and pupils’ learning in primary English teaching.

KEYWORDS

TPR method, teachers’ teaching in primary school, empirical study

Cite this paper

References
FENG, L. N. (2009). An analysis of TPR method. The Science Education Article Collects, 43, 27-34.
Gaab, C. (2006). TPRS: Evolution or creation? Language Magazines, 57, 36-40.
Gouin, F. (1894). The art of teaching and studying language. London: George Philip and Son.
Hamilton, C. R. (1998). Paths in the brain, actions of the mind: Special issue in Honor of Roger W. Sperry. Neuropsychology, 36(10).
James, J. A. (1977). Children learning another language: A developmental hypothesis. Child Development, 48, 1040-1048.
Krashen, S. D. (2003). Exploration in language acquisition and language use: The Taipei lectures. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemam.
PENG, J. Q. (2009). On features of TPR teaching skills and training measures. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Medical University, 28, 17-26.
Seefeldt, C., & Barbour, N. (1986). Early childhood education: An introduction. New York: Merrill Publishing Company.
SHAO, Q. (2010). Teaching Chinese as a foreign language in TPR. Literature Education, 50, 46-52.   
SU, B. (1995). An exploration of TPR method of children English teaching. Taian Journal of Teachers College, 35, 67-74. 
WANG, M. (2005). An full comprehension of TPR method and its application to children English teaching. Journal of Hetao University, 18, 43-51. 
ZHU, C. X. (2013). An application of TPR method to oral teaching of English beginners. Overseas English, 29, 37-44. 

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]