Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

ABSTRACT

Post democracy after 1994, women in South Africa were appointed at leadership positions in all sectors, specifically higher educatrion. Before the year 2,000, in most organizations, women were underrepresented in positions due to men domination and previous discrimination of women. The study seeks to analyses aspects of Women’s positions, which gives them a stable and secure position in the higher education, beyond walls of previous gender discrimination. Women who dominate holding positions offer distinctive viewpoints that contribute to workplace positivity, innovation, and decision-making. This study examines the challenges faced by women in their leadership positions and the influence of higher education practices. This investigation employs a secondary research methodology. A variety of reference sources, such as books and prior research, in order to establish a theoretical framework regarding women’s leadership was applied. Content analysis is employed to synthesize and interpret pertinent data from sources published within the past decade, thereby guaranteeing the reliability of the information through expert commentary. The study finds that approximately 50% of rising women perceive barriers that prevent women for entering management positions and lower advancement rates for women. Women in leadership bully and humbles younger black females in subordinates’ positions. The lack of mentors, lack of supportive policies and practices, overrepresentation in decision-making hampers women progress and Narcissistic behavior of women in leadership. The recommendation of the study encourages organizations to aim at good training programmers, strategies involve survey to know how subordinates are treated at work, leadership programs for women, and flexible work arrangements. Women in top positions needs skills, such as high emotional intelligence, empathy, democratic leadership style, sincerity, and ability to make decisions under critical circumstances. This study will contribute to influence the future of the organization to progress women leadership.

KEYWORDS

women, leadership, effectiveness, career, future

Cite this paper

Mogoshadi Lynah Msiza, South African Higher Education Criris on Rising Women in Positions. US-China Foreign Language, January 2026, Vol. 24, No. 1, 39-47 doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2026.01.006

References

Akkaya, B. (2020). Opinions of educational administrators on glass ceiling syndrome preventing women from becoming senior managers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(3), 76-89.

Akkaya, B., & Bagieńska, A. (2022). The role of agile women leadership in achieving team effectiveness through interpersonal trust for business agility. Sustainability, 14(7), 4070. Article 4070.

Beehler, C. (2023). Paternal gender stereotypes and child gender-typed behaviors: A correlational, quantitative study (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).

Centre for Global Education. (2021). Tenancy of gender inequality in South Africa: A higher education perspective. Issue 33.

Cannito, M., Naldini, M., & Santero, A. (2023). Investigating the glass ceiling in Italian academia. women’s strategies and barriers to career advancement. Sociologica, 17(2), 93-114.

Cheung, F, M., & Halpern, D. (2010, April). Women at the top. In Powerful leaders define success as work + family in a culture of gender (Vol. 65, No. 3). American Psychologist. Colombia Avenue, Claremont.

Daft, R., Kendricks, M., & Vershinina, N. (2010). Motivation and perseverance of women in education leadership in the United States of America. Journal of Science and Sustainable Dvelopment. Chicago, United States.

Dessie, W. A. (2021). Women and Ethiopian politics: Political leaders’ attitude and views on women’s effectiveness. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1948653.

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence Northwestern Univertsity, 2029 Sheridan Road. Illinois, United State. The Leadrrtship Quartely, 14, 807-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004.

Fanning, K., Williams, J., & Williamson, M. G. (2021). Group recruiting events and gender stereotypes in employee selection. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(4), 2496-2520.

Fapohunda, T. M. (2018). The glass ceiling and women's career advancement. BVIMSR’s Journal of Management Research, 10(1), 21-30. Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique: A feminist political debate. Chicago.

Han, S., & Noland, M. (2020). Women, leadership, and Asian economic performance. Asia Pacific, 142. East-West Center.

Heilman, M, E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizationl ladder. Journal of Special Issues, 57, 657-674. New York, United States.

Hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.

Kaftandzieva, T., & Nakov, L. (2021). Glass ceiling factors hindering womens advancement in management hierarchy. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 27(2), 16-29.

Johnson, S. K., & Lacerenza, C. N. (2018). Leadership is male-centric: Gender issues. in the study of leadership. In What’s wrong with leadership? (pp. 121-137). Routledge. University of Colorado, Boulder. USA.

Ottsen, C,L. (2019). Lucky to reach the top. In Gendered perspectives on leadership acquisition across Qatar and Denmark. Development and Lerarning in Organizations: An International Journal (April, 2020).

Porter, M. G. (2023). Gender stereotype biases within law enforcement clinical psychological evaluation. Illinois, United States.

Post, C., Latu, I. M., & Belkin, L. Y. (2019). A female leadership trust advantage in times of crisis: Under what conditions? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 215-231.

Punjab Commission on the Status of Women. (2017). Gender Parity Report 2016. Lahore: Government of Punjab.

Saab, M. (2014, June 12). The surprising countries with more women in corporates leadership than the U.S. or even Scandinavia. Norway.  

Thornton, G. (2015). Women in business: The path to leadership. In Grant Thornton International Business Report (2015).

Thornton, G. (2021). Women in business. A window of opportunity. Retrieved from https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/
women-in-business-2021/(open in a new window)

UNHCR. (2021). The UN Refugee Agency: The stories beyond the numbers. UNHCR Global Report. Geneva, Switzerland.

Wolfram, H. J., Alfermann, D., & Athenstaedt, U. (2020). Gender, gender self-perceptions, and workplace leadership. Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics. Springer, cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_22-1.

World Economic Forum. (2022). The Global Gender Gap Report 2022”. Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2022/digest/

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wu, Y. L., Shao, B., Newman, A., & Schwarz, G. (2021). Crisis leadership: A review and future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101518.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]