 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Jıbid Bulğan and Elçin Filiz Taş
Full-Text PDF
XML 43 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2026.01.003
Department of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34367, Turkey
This paper aims to investigate several process development models and finally focus on the Design Structure Matrix which is one of most up to date methods. It can be seen that the use of the DSM not only benefits the real estate development project in whole, but also enhances the construction phase of the building production by providing clear planning of the process, by defining relationships between actors and tasks, by the ability to see future risks and agility in taking action in unexpected scenarios during construction phase. In order to use the DSM in Turkey during the construction phase of building production process, some adaptations should be made. The construction phase may be considered the most structured phase in the Turkish market. Since the application of the project must have a defined schedule and budget, and all the actors are tied with contracts, there is not much space for disorder. However still compared to the original Design Structure Matrix, the Turkish construction industry lacks some of the formal agreement tasks, has unequal task distribution and should be more inclusive of marketing and sales activities.
Construction phase, design structure matrix, process models
Jıbid Bulğan, Elçin Filiz Taş. (2026). Use of the Design Structure Matrix During the Construction Phase of Building Production Process in Turkey, January 2026, Vol. 20, No. 1, 17-23
[1] Bulgan, J. (2017). Adaptation of the design structure matrix to the Turkish real estate development market. İstanbul Technical University Graduate Thesis.
[2] Bulloch, B., Sullivan, J. (2009). Application of the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) to the Real Estate Development Process. Center for Real Estate Thesis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[3] Bulloch, B., Sullivan, J. (2010). Information – The Key to the Real Estate Development Process, Cornell Real Estate Review, 8, 78-87.
[4] DiPasquale, D., Wheaton, W. (1996). Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved October 03, 2016, from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1143374.files/Wheaton%20Chapters%201_2.pdf
[5] Graaskamp, J. A. (1981). Fundamentals of Real Estate Development. Washington, D.C.: ULI-the Urban Land Institute, 1981. Retrieved December 08, 2016, from http://morris.marginalq.com/GREM_RE720_MoreFiles/Urban%20Econ%20Graaskamp%20ULI.PDF
[6] Hasol, E. A. (2001). Gayrimenkulde Planlama Donemi Yasiyoruz, GYODER Gayrimenkul Zirvesi II. Konferansi, 17-19 Nisan, Finans Dunyasi Dergisi Eki, Istanbul, sf. 16-19.
[7] Healey, P. (1991). Models of the Development Process: A Review. Journal of Property Research , 8, 219-238.
[8] Kohlhepp, D. (2012). The Real Estate Development Matrix. The American Real Estate Society Meetings. Florida. Retrieved December 20, 2016, from https://www.ccimef.org/pdf/2012-299.The-Real-Estate-Development-Matrix.4-21-12.pdf
[9] Medin, R. (2000). Potansiyel Harekete Gecirilmeli, GYODER 21. yy da Gayrimenkul Sektoru Konferansi, 28 Nisan, Finans Dunyasi Dergisi Eki, Istanbul, sf. 10-12.
[10] Miles, M. E., Netherton, Laurence M., Schmitz, A. (2015). Real Estate Development - 5th Edition : Principles and Process. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 1 December 2016.
[11] Trevillion, E. (2002). Development and Developers: Perspectives on Property. In S. Guy, & J. Henneberry. Oxford: Blackwell Science.