Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Shandong University, Jinan, China

ABSTRACT

In Christianity, the passion and resurrection of Jesus Christ are a fact of history. If his resurrection is a miracle to be accepted by faith, no rational demonstration of it is needed, although the Apostle Paul argues by analogy for the resurrection in 1 Corinthians. Being a realist and using Latin, Aquinas holds that human reason can contribute to an understanding of faith; he has no strict distinction between hades and hell. He uses logos to emphasize reason and instrumental causality in explaining the relationship between humanity and divinity for Jesus. Arguing for the resurrection of Jesus, Aquinas should be consistent with his principle of the individualization of a soul through a body, and a separate soul being a substance, but he is inconsistent. Considering Jesus’ soul before his resurrection, Aquinas supports the Apostles’ Creed, but he develops the notion of purgatory, where departed souls sojourn temporarily. This paper argues that Aquinas, in discussing the passion and resurrection of Jesus Christ, obscures the distinction he draws between faith and reason.

KEYWORDS

reason, faith, the passion, resurrection

Cite this paper

References

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]