![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
A Study of the English Article System from the Perspective of Cognitive Grammar
LIU Han
Full-Text PDF
XML 12 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2025.08.006
College of Foreign Languages, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, PR China
Although the English article system is ostensibly composed of two basic forms, “a/an” and “the” actual usage demonstrates a high degree of semantic complexity and cognitive diversity. Traditional grammatical frameworks often treat article usage through a dichotomy of “specific vs. non-specific reference”, yet struggle to effectively explain numerous marginal and unconventional linguistic phenomena, such as expressions like “go to the hospital” and “a Mr. Brown”. With the development of cognitive linguistics, language is viewed as an externalization of mental activity, and the intrinsic connection between linguistic structure and cognitive mechanisms has gained increasing attention. This paper, grounded in Ronald Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar theory, systematically analyzes the semantic construction process and cognitive motivations of English articles by integrating cognitive mechanisms such as figure-ground alignment, subjectivity, and mental spaces. By combining typical sentence examples, the paper reveals the deep cognitive structures underlying article usage from the dual perspectives of semantic representation and communicative function, aiming to provide a more explanatory theoretical framework for the grammatical teaching and cognitive research of English articles.
Cognitive Grammar, English articles, figure-ground, subjectivity, mental space, semantic construction, language cognition
Journal of Literature and Art Studies, August 2025, Vol. 15, No. 8, 642-646
Chomsky, N. (2014). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Hudson, R. A. (1992). Review of Ronald W. Langacker, concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 506-509.
Jespersen, O. (2013). A modern English grammar on historical principles: Volume 7, Syntax. London, UK: Routledge.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Wu, G. (2006). A study of generative grammar. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.