Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

College of Foreign Languages, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, PR China

ABSTRACT

Although the English article system is ostensibly composed of two basic forms, “a/an” and “the” actual usage demonstrates a high degree of semantic complexity and cognitive diversity. Traditional grammatical frameworks often treat article usage through a dichotomy of “specific vs. non-specific reference”, yet struggle to effectively explain numerous marginal and unconventional linguistic phenomena, such as expressions like “go to the hospital” and “a Mr. Brown”. With the development of cognitive linguistics, language is viewed as an externalization of mental activity, and the intrinsic connection between linguistic structure and cognitive mechanisms has gained increasing attention. This paper, grounded in Ronald Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar theory, systematically analyzes the semantic construction process and cognitive motivations of English articles by integrating cognitive mechanisms such as figure-ground alignment, subjectivity, and mental spaces. By combining typical sentence examples, the paper reveals the deep cognitive structures underlying article usage from the dual perspectives of semantic representation and communicative function, aiming to provide a more explanatory theoretical framework for the grammatical teaching and cognitive research of English articles.

KEYWORDS

Cognitive Grammar, English articles, figure-ground, subjectivity, mental space, semantic construction, language cognition

Cite this paper

Journal of Literature and Art Studies, August 2025, Vol. 15, No. 8, 642-646

References

Chomsky, N. (2014). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Hudson, R. A. (1992). Review of Ronald W. Langacker, concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 506-509.

Jespersen, O. (2013). A modern English grammar on historical principles: Volume 7, Syntax. London, UK: Routledge.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

Wu, G. (2006). A study of generative grammar. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]