Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
SinišaPekevski
Full-Text PDF
XML 5 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2185/2025.02.002
Affiliation(s)
School of Applied Social Science,Nova Gorica, Slovenia
ABSTRACT
A startup company is
not just a simple company; it is an engine for developing the country that
creates jobs, creates economic growth, drains the brain, and attracts finance
institutions. The economic advancement of a nation can often be gauged by the
maturity and robustness of its startup ecosystem, alongside the level of
governmental investment and support provided to startups. This research aims to
examine the definition and conceptualization of the term “startup”, identify
established criteria for classifying a startup, and determine whether explicit
legal provisions exist that differentiate startups from newly established
companies with a focus on Europe.To achieve these objectives, the research
includes analysis methods, focusing on secondary data and official
institutional data. This approach facilitated a thorough examination of
existing definitions, legal frameworks, and institutional practices regarding
the identification and registration of startups across various European
nations. The findings reveal a significant discrepancy within Europe concerning
legislative clarity on startups. Although many European countries exhibit a
well-developed startup ecosystem, not many countries possess formal legislative
frameworks that explicitly define a startup and delineate its distinguishing
characteristics from those of other newly founded businesses. Notably,
according to the Global Startup Index 2024, countries such as Sweden, Germany,
France, and the Netherlands rank highest in terms of favourable conditions for
startup development. Even of high rankings and developed ecosystems, Germany
and Sweden have lack of legal framework and definitions of startups, instead
relying primarily on individual programs and ad-hoc initiatives to support
entrepreneurial ventures like France and the Netherlands do.The research
identified that some European countries, Lithuania, Estonia, Spain, Latvia, and
France, have adopted legal regulations that formally define and make
differences from startups to other companies, outlining clear criteria and
benefits associated with startup status. In contrast, analysis of the former
Yugoslavian countries, specifically Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Macedonia, and Montenegro, except Serbia, indicates a conspicuous absence of
clear definitions, formal criteria, or legal frameworks distinguishing startups
from newly established businesses. These nations lack provisions within their
legislative frameworks explicitly addressing the identification and
registration of startup companies, resulting in ambiguity and inconsistency in
classification and support measures.Results from this research underscore the
necessity for clearer, standardized definitions and robust legal frameworks to
effectively support and foster startup ecosystems. It provides a foundation for
policymakers and stakeholders within the startup ecosystem to enhance clarity
in legislation, facilitate targeted support, and promote sustainable economic
growth through innovative entrepreneurial activities.
KEYWORDS
startup, business, entrepreneurship
Cite this paper
References