Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Northeastern University, Shenyang, China

ABSTRACT

The usage of large numerals in child language reflects not only cognitive development, but also sociocultural influences. To investigate this phenomenon, we analyze the semantic functions of large numerals “hundred”, “thousand”, and “ten-thousand” in Mandarin-speaking children by comparing them with adult data based on a self-constructed corpus. Our results showed that both groups predominantly use large numerals for non-cardinal functions, particularly for expressing abstract concepts and culture-specific meanings rather than for exact numerical quantification.Notably however, while adults tend to utilize large numbers primarily for metaphorical or rhetorical purposes, children demonstrate stronger preference for employing large numerals in counting routines and symbolic representations. These findings illuminate the multifaceted semantic properties of large numerical expressions in Mandarin Chinese.

KEYWORDS

large numerals, child language, semantic functions, corpus-based study

Cite this paper

YANG Meiling & DU Ailin, A Corpus-Based Study on the Semantic Functions of Large Numerals in Mandarin-Speaking Children. US-China Foreign Language, May 2025, Vol. 23, No. 5, 169-175 doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2025.05.002

References

Cheung, P., & Daniel, A. (2023). A million is more than a thousand: Children’s acquisition of very large number words. Developmental Science, 26(1), e13246.

Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307-314

Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1457-1465.

Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30(2), 333-370

Miller, K. F., Smith, C. M., Zhu, J., & Zhang, H. (1995). Preschool origins of cross-national differences in mathematical competence: The role of number-naming systems. Psychological Science, 6(1), 56-60.

Ngan, S. S., & Rao, N. (2010). Chinese number words, culture, and mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 180-206.

Wen, Z. J., & Hu, G. L. (2001). Developing and utilizing the world’s largest child language corpus—CHILDES. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 45(5), 374-377.

Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36(2), 155-193.

Xu, Y., & Regier, T. (2014). Numeral systems across languages support efficient communication: From approximate numerosity to recursion. Open Mind, 4, 57-70.

Yan, X. X., & Su, X. S. (2023). A study on the development of cardinal numerals in Chinese-speaking children. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 51(1), 121-130.  

Yin, J. Q., & Li, W. (2002). On the “Qian A Wan B” type of idioms. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 22(S1), 140-143.

Zhu, K., & Wu, J. (2012). A cultural perspective on the treatment of numerical fuzziness in English and Chinese idioms. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 33(5), 195-198.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]