![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Integrated Cognition of Pragmatic Presupposition and Dexis
WEN Jinhai, LIU Mingzhi
Full-Text PDF
XML 817 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-623X/2024.04.007
Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing, China
It is maintained that pragmatics is simply the eclectic extension of linguistic structuralism in this paper, which is covetous of simplistic combination of structure and single units, while cognitive linguistics aims to look into the development and integration of linguistic competence in actual use, and pays more attention to dynamic analysis of language as a whole. And then its exemplification is made with reference to the lasting issues, presupposition, and dexis, in pragmatics.
pragmatics, presupposition, dexis, cognitive linguistics
WEN Jinhai, LIU Mingzhi. (2024). The Integrated Cognition of Pragmatic Presupposition and Dexis. US-China Education Review A, April 2024, Vol. 14, No. 4, 275-279.
Guo, H. (2008). The kindred and complement nature of pragmatics and cognitive linguistics-explained from modern philosophy and semiotics. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 16(1), 1-4.
Jiang, X. H. (2006). The cognitive view of pragmatic explorations. Foreign Languages in China, 3(6), 33-37.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.
Marmaridou, S. S. A. (2000). Pragmatic meaning and cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Stamenov, M. I. (2003). Quo vadis, pragmatics? Alternative conceptions in making sense of a heterogeneous discipline (review). Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 263-297.
Zhang, H., & Cai, H. (2005). The complementarity of cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Foreign Languages, 28(3), 14-21.