 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Malicious Uses of Artificial Intelligence (MUAI) and Psychological Security in the Case of Iran
Davoud Gharayagh-Zandi
Full-Text PDF
XML 92 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2134/2023.06.005
Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Artificial intelligence (AI) is attracted great attention in the world, because its uses are going to be prevailed in many areas and issues. As a result, keeping the situation to use AI in the positive and optimistic manner would be meant that it is well-protected the society’s mentality. The malicious uses of AI in the case of Iran are mattered by the three issues—the huge sanctions imposed to Iran by the Western countries, the psychological dissonance there is in the Iran’s decision making process, and by ontological security perceived by the Iran’s officials. It is tried to examine them in accordance with the technical, cognitive, and the institutional levels of AI.
AI, Iran, malicious uses, psychological security, public policy
Davoud Gharayagh-Zandi. (2023). The Malicious Uses of Artificial Intelligence (MUAI) and Psychological Security in the Case of Iran. International Relations and Diplomacy, Nov.-Dec. 2023, Vol. 11, No. 6, 266-270.
Bazarkina, D. (2023). Current and future threat of the malicious use of artificial intelligence by terrorist psychological aspects. In E. Pashentsev (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of malicious use of AI and psychological security (pp. 251-272). Macmillan: Palgrave.
Cai, C. H., & Zhang, R. Y. (2023). Malicious use of artificial intelligence uncertainty, and U.S.-China strategic mutual trust. In E. Pashentsev (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of malicious use of AI and psychological security (pp. 377-396). Macmillan: Palgrave.
Dehghani Firrozabadi, R. (2023). Iran’s technology news. An interview of Iran’s presidential scientific and technological vice president with Digito. Retrieved from https://digiato.com/iran-technology-news/iran-rank-ai-government
Duignen, B. (2023). Cognitive dissonance. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/science/cognitive-dissonance
Gharayagh-Zandi, D. (2022). The challenges of Iran-China 25-year comprehensive cooperation plan, with an emphasis on the alliance security dilemma. Politics Quarterly, 52(1), 133-152.
Iranian Students’ News Agency. (2023). The members of National Strategic Council for AI introduced. Retrieved from https://www.isna.ir/news/1402100402505/%D9%BE%DB%8C%D8%B4-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%87-%DA%AF%D8%B0%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C-%DB%B5-%D9%87%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AD%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%87-%D9%87%D9%88%D8%B4-%D9%85%D8%B5%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B9%DB%8C
Khamenei, A. (Jan. 30, 2023). Rapid, continues economic growth is the country’s current necessary. Retrieved from https://english.khamenei.ir/news/9455/Rapid-continuous-economic-growth-is-the-country-s-current-necessity
Mantello, P., Ho, T. M., & Podoletz, L. (2023). Automating extremism: Mapping the affective roles of artificial agents in online radicalization. In E. Pashentsev (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of malicious use of AI and psychological security (pp. 81-103). Macmillan: Palgrave.
Metin, I., & Camgoz, S. M. (2011). The advances in the history of cognitive dissonance theory. International Theory of Humanities and Social Science, 1(6), 131-136.
Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics; state identity and security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341-370.
Moein, S. (Oct. 4, 2023). The last rank of
Iran in AI in comparison with the rivals. An interview of the head of
Innovative Center for AI with Mehr News Agency. Retrieved from https://www.mehrnews.com/news/5824167/%D8%A2%D8%AE%D8%B1%
DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%B1%D8%AA%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%87%D9%88%D8%B4-%D9%85%D8%B5%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B9%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B3%D9%87-%D8%A8%D8%A7-%D8%B1%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7
Pashentsev, E. (2023). Introduction: The malicious use of artificial intelligence—Growing threats, delayed responses. In E. Pashentsev (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of malicious use of AI and psychological security (pp. 1-19). Macmillan: Palgrave.
Rabiee, H. (2021). A smart move: Knowing on
AI and how it solves the challenges. An interview with Fars News Agency. Retrieved from https://www.farsnews.ir/news/14000909000556/%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%A7-%D9%BE%DB%
8C%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D9%87%D9%88%D8%B4-%D9%85%D8%B5%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B9%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86--%D9%87%D9%88%D8%B4%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C-%DA%86%DA%AF%D9%88%D9%86%D9%87-%D9%85%D8%B4%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA-%DA%A9%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D8%AD%D9%84
Ronfeldt, D., & Arquilla, J. (2020). Whose story wins: Rise of the Noo Shere, Noopilitik and information age statecraft. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
Steele, B. (2008). Ontological security in international relations; self-identity and the IR state. New York and London: Routledge.
Vacarelu, M. (2023). Malicious use of artificial intelligence in political campaigns: Challenges for international psychological security for the next decades. In E. Pashentsev (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of malicious use of AI and psychological security (pp. 203-230). Macmillan: Palgrave.