 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Alejandro Restrepo Montoya
Full-Text PDF
XML 146 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2024.02.006
Faculty of Architecture Technische, Universität München TUM, Munich 80333, Germany
This research aims to generate processes of industrialization and qualification of social housing in Colombia through prefabrication, low energy consumption and high environmental quality to reduce the current deficit and improve the quality of life in communities with fewer economic resources. Modular coordination and the use of materials with thermal behaviors, appropriate to the country’s climatic characteristics, reduce production costs, avoid waste and improve the architectural and environmental quality of social housing. Passive cooling strategies, such as controlling solar incursion and generating natural cross ventilation eliminate energy consumption and allow reaching desired standards of comfort. In a context in which traditional construction systems have still not resolved the social housing deficit in Colombia and which generate high costs for energy consumption in the search for thermal comfort, industrialized and efficient construction with high environmental quality provides solutions according to the economic, geographic, social and cultural context in Colombia.
Efficiency, industrialization, social housing, sustainability, low energy consumption.
Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 18 (2024) 92-99 doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2024.02.006
[1] Rojas, L. 2005. “Déficit de Vivienda.” In Boletín Censo General DANE, pp. 2-3. (in Spanish)
[2] Forero, S. 2011. “Tendencia Reciente de la Construcción de Vivienda en Colombia.” Informe económico CAMACOL 31: 4-10.
[3] Loaiza, E. 2012. “The Increase of the Deficit of Social Housing in Colombia.” In XX Version of the International Construction, Architecture, and DesignConvention Expocamacol, Medellín, Colombia, August 27-30, 2012.
[4] National Administrative Department of Statistics of Colombia (DANE). 2013. “Variaciones Porcentuales 1972-2013.” In Índice de Costos de la Construcción de Vivienda ICCV. www.dane.gov.co.
[5] Botero, A. 2012. “Cost of Construction with Traditional Systems in Colombia.” In XX Version of the International Construction, Architecture, and DesignConvention Expocamacol, Medellín, Colombia, August 27-30, 2012.
[6] Royal Spanish Academy of the Language. www.rae.es.
[7] Fisac, M. 1997. “Durable, Traccionable.” Monografías de Arquitectura, Tecnología y Construcción 5: 4.
[8] Ministerio de Vivienda, Ciudad y Territorio de Colombia. 2013. Proyectos VIS y VIP. www.minvivienda.gov.co.
[9] Elías, X. 2009. “Uso de subproductos industriales.” In Reciclaje de ResiduosIndustriales, p. 343.
[10] Regás, X. 2013. “Cost of Construction Materials.” In Precast Concrete Conference, Barcelona, Spain, January 14, 2013.
[11] Loaiza, E. 2012. “The Cost of Transportation.” In Precast concrete Committee of the Colombian Chamber of Construction CPC, Medellín, Colombia, August 20, 2012.
[12] Cardona, F. 2012. “The Cost of Installation.” In Precast concrete Committee of the Colombian Chamber of Construction CPC, Medellín, Colombia, August 20, 2012.
[13] Salazar, J. 2007. “Control solar mediantefachadas de doblepiel.” Infodomus Construcción Sostenible y Edificios Inteligentes 13: 82.