Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

1. Industrial Risk & Safety Management/Engie Tractebel, Brussels 1000, Belgium
2. Onshore Wind Realization/Engie Tractebel, Brussels 1000, Belgium

ABSTRACT

In regions with high population densities, the development of wind energy projects situated in an industrial environment or close to cities is a preferred option, since it represents some major advantages. On the other hand, it also represents a drawback in terms of safety during winter conditions. Ice accretion on the wind turbine blades represents a major risk as ice fall may cause incidents, even lethal accidents to people in the vicinity. The current common methodology to identify the potentially risky areas around wind turbines uses a deterministic approach which leads to excessively large zones around the turbines without granularity or circumstantial sub-zones. The approach presented in this paper is a probabilistic risk-based Monte Carlo methodology associated with an acceptance framework. Developed by Engie Tractebel, this methodology allows a much more detailed mapping of the risk zones and also enables to model the impact of mitigating measures. This represents a real risk-based decision tool for windfarm developers and operators. The approach is fully compliant with the IEA (International Energy Agency) Wind “International Recommendations for Ice Fall and Ice Throw Risk Assessments” and recent international safety standards. The tool is available as a cloud-based application called TRiceR.

KEYWORDS

Ice fall, wind turbine, risk assessment, mitigating measures, Monte-Carlo simulations, TRiceR.

Cite this paper

References

[1]       Cobbaert, J. 2019. Wind Turbine: Ice Accretion and Ice Release Components of an Icefall Risk Assessment Model. Dissertation KULeuven.

[2]       Dalili, N., Edrisy, A., and Carriveau, R. 2009. A Review of Surface Engineering Issues Critical to Wind Turbine Performance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (2): 428-38.

[3]       ISO. 2017. ISO 12494 Atmospheric Icing of Structures. International Standard Organisation.

[4]       Lamraoui, F., Fortin, G., Benoit, R., Perron, J., and Masson, C. 2014. Atmospheric Icing Impact on Wind Turbine Production. Cold Regions Science and Technology 100: 36-49.

[5]       Lamraoui, F. 2014. In-Cloud Icing and Supercooled Cloud Microphysics: From Reanalysis to Mesoscale Modeling. PhD thesis, University of Quebec.

[6]       Battisti, L. 2015. Wind Turbines in Cold ClimateIcing Impacts and Mitigation Systems. New York: Springer International Publishing.

[7]       Walton, W., and Woolcock, A. 1960. “The Suppression of Airborne Dust by Water Spray”. Int. J. Air Pollut 3, 129-153.

[8]       Leuenberger, L., Haefele, A., Omanovic, N., Fengler, M., Martucci, G., Calpini, B., Fuhrer, O., and Rossa, A. 2020. Improving High-Impact Numerical Weather Prediction with Lidar and Drone Observations. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 101: 1036-51. doi: 10.1175/bams-d-19-0119.1.

[9]       Morgan, C., Bossanyi, E., and Seifert, H. 1998. Assessment of Safety Risks Arising from Wind Turbine Icing.” In Proceedings of the IV BOREAS Conference, Enontekio, Hetta, Finland.

[10]    Seifert, H., Westerhellweg, A., and Kröning, J. 2003. Risk Analysis of Ice Throw from Wind Turbines. In Proceedings of the VI BOREAS Conference, 9-11 April 2003, Pyh, Finland. 

[11]    TNO. 1989. CPR16E: Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage to People and Objects from Release of Hazardous Materials. New York: TNO.

[12]    Geerinck, P. 2020. Substantiation for the Use of the Impact Area Parameter for Human Impact of Ice Fragments in the Monte-Carlo Icefall Trajectory Model. Tractebel.

[13]    IEA Wind. 2018. International Recommendations for the Ice Fall: An Ice Throw Risk Assessment. IEA Wind TCP Task 19.

[14]    HSE. 2001. Reducing Risk Protecting PeopleHSEs Decision Making Process. London, UK: Health and Safety Executive.

[15]    CENELEC. 2017. EN 50126: Railway ApplicationsThe Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) Part 2. CENELEC.

[16]    Vrijling, V. H. 1994. A Framework for Risk Evaluation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 43: 245-61.

[17]    IEA Wind. 2017. Wind Energy Projects in Cold Climates (2nd ed.). Finland: IEA Wind.

[18]    IEC 61400-31. Wind Energy Generation SystemsSiting Risk Assessment. Unclassified draft document.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]