Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
customer@davidpublishing.com
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Southwest University, Chongqing, China

ABSTRACT

In the past fifty years, scholars have examined fields of England’s politics in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries; however, the politics of mobility has not been extensively studied. This article addresses Prince Hal and King Henry Ⅴ’s wildness within mobility as an important role to the advancement of metaphorical wildness. King Henry V’s “wildness” is an element that is often discussed in Shakespeare’s Henry IV and Henry Ⅴ. Locating in Prince Hal’s wandering to uncertainty, unsettledness and changeability a potential to unveil the disguised aspects of the assumed politics, Shakespeare focuses on the interlocking aspect of wildness and mobility. He calls for exploring a recognition of ideal character and tactical figure into a transitional strategy of it. In reorganising civil culture, Shakespeare sees the possibility of re-configuring the approach from aimless roaming to communal mobility. It is the approach of these mobilities through ways of wildnes that permits us to explore between wildness as a strategy and as a metaphor, and to understand in the notion of early modern mobility that is as tactical in ambition as it is consequential in such contexts of Shakespeare.

KEYWORDS

wildness, mobility, Shakespeare, Prince Hal, King Henry IV, King Henry V

Cite this paper

Journal of Literature and Art Studies, August 2021, Vol. 11, No. 8, 570-578

References

Bryson, A. (1998). From courtesy to civility: Changing codes of conduct in early modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dudley, E., & Maximillian, E. (Eds.). (1972). The wild man within: An image in western thought from the renaissance to romanticism. London: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Fulwood, W. (1568). The enimie of idlenesse: Teaching the manner and stile how to endite, compose and write all sorts of epistles and letters. London: Leonard Maylard.

Hazlitt, W. (1818). Characters of Shakespeare’s plays (2nd, ed.). London: Taylor and Hessey.

Jucker, A. H. (2020). Politeness in the history of English: From the middle ages to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leerssen, J. (1995). wildness, wilderness, and Ireland: Medieval and early-modern patterns in the demarcation of civility. Journal of the History of Ideas, 56(1), 25-39.

Peltonen, M. (2003). The duel in early modern England: Civility, politeness and honour. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. (2003). Early modern civil discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

Rollison, D. (1999). Exploding England: The dialectics of mobility and settlement in early modern England. Social History, 24(1), 1-16.

Shakespeare, W. (1943). The complete works of William Shakespeare. W. J. Craig (Ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, G., & Jowett, J. (Eds.). (2016). The New Oxford Shakespeare: The complete works modern critical edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas, K. (2018). In pursuit of civility: Manners and civilization in early modern England. London: Yale University Press.

Turner, C. (2010). Investigating sociological theory. London: Sage.

“wildness, n.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, September 2020, Retrevided from www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/229017.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - 2025 David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: order@davidpublishing.com