Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Ma Xiaofen
Full-Text PDF XML 802 Views
DOI:10.17265/2160-6579/2021.01.002
Affiliation(s)
National University of Singapore, Singapore
ABSTRACT
With the frequent economic cooperation and the
cultural communication from China to Africa focusing on foreign policies and
economic efforts is insufficient. Because
culture-oriented investigations make more contributions to the development of
the pan-cultural exchange, and they complement general culture inquiries.
Chinese philosophies are very representative for Asiancentricity. The reason
why is that a common key of the Asian values, beliefs, and worldviews which
exceed many philosophies and religions, like Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism.
Secondly, the aspects of ontology, epistemology and axiology of Asiancentricity
and Afrocentricity are quite similar. This can also be understood as
commensurability existing in Chinese and African philosophies in some ways. In
Chinese philosophy, everything and everyone can become valuable in
relationships with others, and the myriad becomes perceivable and meaningful.
In the meantime, conforming to the fundamental principles of the
Asiancentricity perspectives, all of the elements in the universe, including
animals, human beings, natural phenomena and inanimate objects, are connected
with each other. Both of two
philosophies emphasise the importance of being communal and harmony, rather
than emphasising the characteristics of ego and individualism. Although,
Asiancentricity and Afrocentricity are not totally common and universal, they
do have enumerable commensurable factors and are embedded in the communicative
and cultural particularities.
KEYWORDS
Chinese philosophies, Asiancentricity, Afrocentricity, commensurability
Cite this paper
References