Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan

ABSTRACT

The Freudian notion of the compulsion repetition governed by the death drive beyond the pleasure principle with its inherent persistence of a nostalgic dream both to restore the earlier state of things and to return to the inanimate state has attracted philosophers, particularly Deleuze and Derrida, to revise, enrich, and broaden the concept in their theories of difference in repetition and the archives. Deleuze reconnects it with Nietzsche’s notion of eternal return to tackle with the phenomenon of the events returning in difference of repetition. As to Lacan, the post-Freudian psychoanalyst, the death drive is in search of the lost Object, the original loss within the subject, Derrida theorizes the concept of archives in the unconscious memories to further elaborate that the death drive, in its interiorly-dialectical conflicts on the way to search for “a priori,” namely, “the origin,” has encountered the loss. Thus, the death drive, haunted by the specters of the past, develops the archive fever with the persistent passion to reach trembling sublimity. The movie, The Legend of 1900, directed by Giuseppe Tornatore, helps understand the problem that the talented pianist, 1900, abandoned in the ship by his birth parents when he was born and raised by a black worker as his foster father who died by accident, chooses to die with the ruined ship, “his only home,” in absolute solitude although he was once driven by his passionate love for a woman to get off the ship and he failed the chance. The1900’s official identity is the lost archive on the land; he has been haunted by the lost archive: no memories of his birth parents.

KEYWORDS

archive, the death drive, difference, repetition, the dark precursor, the haunting specter

Cite this paper

Emily ShuHui Tsai. (2020). The Lost Archive: On Events in Difference of Repetition. Philosophy Study, December 2020, Vol. 10, No. 12, 894-901.

References

Deleuze, G. (1972). Proust and Signs. Trans. R. Howard. New York: George Braziller.

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. Trans. P. Patton. London: The Athlone Press.

Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Trans. G. C. Spivak. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Derrida, J. (1995). Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Trans. E. Prenowitz. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Evans, D. (1996). An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.

Fink, B. (2016). Lacan on Love: An Exploration of Lacan’s Seminar VIII, Transference. Malden: Polity.

Freud, S. (2001). Beyond the Pleasure Principle.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XVIII, 1920-1922. London: Vintage. 7-64

Lacan, J. (1992). The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960. Ed. J. A. Miller. London: Routledge.

Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J. B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. New York: W. W. Norton.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]