Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Ratnasamy Munaindy, Francis Xavier, Fauzan Jakarni and Salihudin Hassim
Full-Text PDF XML 1013 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2142/2020.03.001
Affiliation(s)
Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Seri Kembangan 43400, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
The performance evaluation
of existing flexible pavements has become a priority issue for many highway
maintenances engineers. To make appropriate rehabilitation and management decisions,
the engineers most often rely on efficient methods for the determination of the
strength of pavement layers. Resilient modulus is a very important parameter to
be identified and used in pavement design. The resilient moduli of asphalt
mixtures are typically measured using the indirect tension test procedure in
compliance with the ASTM D4123 standard that is superseded by ASTM D7369. The
standard requirement is that the prepared specimens for the tests should have a
minimum height of the sample over its diameter ratio of 0.4. Generally,
specimens used in the tests are either a nominal 100
mm or 150 mm in diameter with a minimum thickness over diameter
ratio of 0.4. However, 100 mm diameter core specimens taken from site wearing
courses with thicknesses ranging from 40 mm to 50 mm most often do not fulfil
the minimum ratio of 0.4 after they are trimmed for testing. Since there was no
any option, part of the binder courses had to be trimmed to make up for the
minimum ratio requirement. This tends to result in inaccurate assessment of the resilient
modulus values of the samples. As such, a new procedure was explored to test
specimens smaller than 100 mm in diameter. This may minimize the material
volume requirement from the field and also for the fabrication of smaller
samples in the laboratory. Based on the available thickness of wearing course
or overlay, the appropriate sizes were determined. For a two-layer system a
56.3 mm diameter was deemed necessary while a 37.5 mm diameter was observed to
be appropriate for a three-layer system. Such an approach for resilient modulus
test using miniature specimens of 56.3 mm and 37.5 mm in diameter has a great potential for practical
relevance for the industry.
KEYWORDS
Resilient modulus, new procedure, cost, time and less destructive.
Cite this paper
References