 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
An Exploration of Richard Powers’ Ecological Thoughts in His The Echo Maker
CHEN Yi
Full-Text PDF
XML 603 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2020.09.004
Southwest University; Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing, China
Richard Powers is one of American famous contemporary writers, a rising star of American postmodernist fiction, and one of the representatives of the Generation Xers as well. He explores the impacts of some factors such as ecological environment, social culture, and family ethics on our modern society by use of his abundant knowledge about gene engineer, neurology, family ethics, etc. From the perspective of Marxism ecological philosophy, this paper deeply analyses The Echo Maker, Richard Powers’ masterpiece and interrelates the ecological thoughts implied in this novel. This work criticizes anthropocentrism and expresses the priority of nature. Human being is part of nature which our human being bases on and human being is closely related with nature. Human being should develop ecological consciousness, respect and care nature, and try every means to keep benign interaction with nature in order to build a stable and harmonious global community.
Richard Powers, The Echo Maker, The ecological thoughts
Chen, Z. H. (2003). Albert Schweitzer: Reverence for life: The basic discourse of fifty years. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.
Commoner, B. (1997). The closed cycles. (W. H. Hou, Trans.). Changchun: Jilin People’s Publishing House.
Du, X. J. (2011). Research on the historical development of Marxist ecological philosophy. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
Gartner, C. B. (1983). Rachel Carson. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing.
Glotfelty, C. (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
Houser, H. (2012). Wondrous strange: Eco-sickness, emotion, and the echo maker. American Literature, 84(2), 381-408.
Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marx, K. (1972). The complete works of Marx and Engels. Vol. 24. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
Nash, R. (1999). The rights of nature. (T. J. Yang, Trans.). Qingdao: Qingdao Press.
Powers, R. (2006). The Echo Maker. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sun, J. (2015). Defending novels: A study of novels by Richard Powers. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University Press.
White, L. (1996). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. In C. Glofelty and H. Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. 3-51). Athens: The University of Georgia.
Yu, M. C. (2000). Eco-philosophy. Xi’an: Shaanxi People’s Education.
Zhou, G. X. (2015). An overview of Marxist ecological philosophy. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.