Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
Guido Migliorati
Full-Text PDF XML 861 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2177/2020.06.004
Affiliation(s)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Brescia, Italy
ABSTRACT
We can argue that the
making and the spread of the cult of Glykon of Abonuteichos can be explained through a cognitivist template. Lucian of
Samosata’s Pseudomantis booklet and
the material evidence, which testifies to the building and the spread of
Glykon’s cult by Alexander of Abonuteichos, belong to a historical context
characterized by instability, deadly epidemics and military pressure. It is a
historical context, therefore, in which people feel reality with anxiety; one
of the reactions is the growing up of the belief in prophylactic and prophetic
cults, capable to protecting and forecasting. Since Lucian had pointed out that
fear and hope were the forces that dominated the lives of men, just as the same
had denounced that Alexander of Abonuteichos was ready to exploit those forces
to his advantage, the cult of Glykon could
be labeled as a trick. However, cognitive science and specifically the
hard-wired brain circuit research may offer an alternative explanation: the
interaction between potential risk of low probability, but high impact events
(unstoppable irruptions of the Germans, or generalized impotence against the
spread of disease) can impact on the hard-wired brain circuit activity capable
of keeping social and individual anxiety, implicitly conditioning mentality and
behavior of a religious “entrepreneur” and consumers, both concerned about
protection and forecasting, fear and hope.
KEYWORDS
Supernatural, Glykon of Abonuteichos, Cognitive Science; Lucian of Samosata, Pseudomantis
Cite this paper
References