Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

1. The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
2. The School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, and The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Israel National Center for Biodiversity Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
3. Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in Northwestern China of Ministry of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

ABSTRACT

Livestock grazing and trampling is an important factor in the formation and development of different terrestrial ecosystems. However, despite numerous studies on soil compaction, there is still no consensus as to which kind of effect (positive or negative) animal trampling exerts on soil nematodes. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the animal trampling effect on free-living nematode abundance and diversity, and to define the attenuating effect of the tree canopies (Cupressus sempervirens, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, and Tamarix aphylla) during wet and dry periods. The nematodes were extracted from 100 g aliquots of soil samples (brown-red sandy soils) during cold-wet (CW), warm-wet (WW), and hot-dry (HD) periods during 2013-2014, in a man-made safari-zoo habitat, using the Baermann funnel procedure. Our results revealed the impact of trampling on both free-living nematode abundance and diversity, and their soil habitat. It was found that trampling, along with seasonal fluctuation and the tree-species attenuating effect on the soil medium, resulted in the creation of the spatial-temporal heterogeneity of soil properties in the study area. In turn, variation in soil properties was reflected in soil nematode abundance and diversity, revealing tight correlation with the observed soil properties. Animal trampling had an overwhelming, mostly negative impact on soil nematode abundance, genera, and trophic diversity in the open, bare area. However, the protective effect of the tree canopies, as well as seasonal fluctuations, attenuated this negative impact. The trees had a significant attenuating effect on trampling compared with the open, bare area. However, different tree species during the wet and dry periods had a variable impact on nematode abundance, genera, and trophic diversity. During the hottest period of the year, when external adverse factors dominated the trampling effect, the ability of the trees to protect nematode communities was significantly reduced. Of all the colonizer-persister (cp) continuum of nematode functional guilds, only bacteria-feeding nematodes belonging to the cp-1 guild were positively affected by trampling. In general, nematodes belonging to the r-life-strategy group (colonizers tolerant to environmental disturbance), mainly bacteria-feeding nematodes, were the most numerous (61 and 44% at the trampling and undisturbed sites, respectively). In contrast to the bacteria-feeding group, fungi-feeding nematodes were the smallest group in the study area (8 and 4% in the trampling and undisturbed sites, respectively). The undisturbed sites were a more favorable habitat for the plant-parasite nematodes (9 and 26% in the trampling and undisturbed sites, respectively). Surprisingly, the omnivore-predator nematodes belonging to the K-life strategy group and that are characterized by hypersensitivity to disturbance, were relatively numerous at the trampling (22%) and relatively undisturbed (26%) sites. The results showed that 62% of the nematode species were affected (48% negatively and 14% positively) by either direct trampling or changes in soil properties. The ecological indices confirmed that animal trampling had a negative impact on the soil biota in the study area. Our results suggested that animal trampling exerts significant a direct and indirect effects (through changes in soil properties) on soil free-living nematodes. Moreover, the wet-dry seasonal periods along with the tree canopies protective effect may significantly change the extent of animal trampling impact.

KEYWORDS

Grazing, soil disturbances, environmental factors, biological indicators, ecological index.

Cite this paper

References

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]